SeriousM

The classical A vs B, but recommend C at the end post.

This title could mean so much... It's a Clojure Talk.

> Building flexible systems means embracing the ever-changing shape of information as it flows throughout. How can we document and enforce our expectations without making things brittle? This talk examines some new features coming to Clojure that aim to address this challenge.

25 years ago I figured out that building tools is what I love creating. And looking back, that's wat I really did well, for computers and for humans. About 20 years back I wished I could just express my way to build things and today it's possible! AI is just another tool to create toolings! Nice life!

As well as LinkedIn. "Put your link in the first comment and pin it" was the workaround...

At least we now know that a life is worth: 20mil

That looks really amazing, happy to test it!

A talk with a lawyer would be advised. But this is money you may not want to invest. You could just go on, keep your product improving and proof this way that your solution is more worth than the copycats out there. You just realized how it is to be a valuable target.

Please, where are the others?

And that was the inspiration for the attack in The Expanse, or was it the other way around?

Oh and one last one: is the client headless possible or is a GUI necessary.

Glad you ask and I respect that.

Here are the things I would love to see: - supported tooling (e.g. built in browser) - interaction type ( chat ui, terminal, booth) - context size added (how large is the additional context so that the agent knows the ADE) - extensibility (plugins possible) - completely free, paid possible - range of harness support (some only support claude and codex) - installation type (own server + n clients, only clients and properitary server) - connectivity support of multiple machines (tailscale, SSH, wireguard, proprietary) - age of project, commit count, PR count - multiselect of possible platforms (e.g. windows + android)

I guess that's all that is broadly comparable without going into too much detail.

Thanks for your interest!

well done! but "compare" is a bit of a stretch... maybe you can get an inspiration from models.dev ?

LinkedIn is like "playing" soggy biscuit together, yet you are the biscuit.

I wonder how "make it Bloomberg terminal" would change the ui outcome from ai...