Sakes
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
This uncovered a new problem for nested animations. The high-level page transition animation occurs even when the url root does not change. So I need to be able to ignore animations on Route components located high in the VirtualDOM, and apply animations (sometimes different animations) on Route components located further down.
Maybe you already know of an elegant solution to solve this problem? If so let me know! In the meantime, I'll keep bang'n on this.
Edit:
Concerning giving an indication that a panel has been opened, I'd just use CSSTransition wrapped around whatever element that is going to be introduced to show that it has been opened. Then define your 'enter' animation in css.
If that seems like overkill, and you can't use did mount to determine if the animation should be applied, then I'd just add a css className to your element to introduce some animation defined in CSS.
Obviously, I may be misunderstanding your use cases here. The above are just knee-jerk thoughts on it.
The problem I'm aiming to solve is nested route animations, and allowing for different animations to be applied depending upon the previous route in history.
Implementation will look something like <TransitionGroupRoutes><CSSTransitionRoute path="..."/><CSSTransitionRoute path="..."/></TransitionGroupRoutes>
I downloaded GameSalad one weekend. My 6-year-old son and I ran through the tutorial which took about an hour. Part way through he got distracted. He spent about 20 minutes changing movement speed properties, object colors, & sizes. I was happy to see him get engaged and just start experimenting. While he did not learn how to code, the seed was planted that creating mobile games is something within his reach.
* Make sure you are indexing properly
* limit the number of items returned by introducing paging
* use lazy loading where applicable
I'm sure there are other techniques, but these are my gotos.
There are people who simply want a product/service, no desire for ownership. They post what they'd be will to pay for it, as a customer, and you decide if it is worth your time to build it.
Anyone? Am I understanding this correctly?
But I do have a question for you, when the interests of those with influence align with the ignored, why would your initial reaction be a negative one?
As a programmer / engineer / whatever label you want to give, it is a little easier for us to adjust to changing labor conditions because our careers, as long as not overly specialized, require constant learning.
But I'd prefer not to live a life competing with people all over the globe, or being blindsided by some tech that can execute a majority of my responsibilities as an employee.
Couldn't this argument be applied to any developer for any discipline/speciality?
Sure, more knowledge/context is always better if reasonable to attain, but my experience suggests that your above concerns could also be addressed via team organization rather than expecting all developers to know all things.
They do have federal books as well that apply nation wide, but as most lawyers are highly specialized, that may not apply to what you do?
They have an online reader for all their legal commentary books. They've invested heavily in search. It is pretty fantastic.
hnsakes [at] gmail.com