Rumple22Stilk

It's funny though, llms are quite terrible at most things really.

They can build things, but it's all terrible really. Their "ideas" are terrible.

It's very funny you try to make that argument when your requirement was literally just MIGRANTS, because MIGRANTS = PENSIONS. Which is hilariously a subset of my own requirement, more specific. Absolutely absurd.

No. What I said is just a fact. There's no assumption, the requirement is a fact. You need money to pay for goods and services for the people no longer working.

There's no assumption there? What's the assumption, that goods and services need to be paid for?

So stop bringing up migrants for no reason at all. The actual issue is money, and there are many ways to obtain money.

The nonsense about troops is of course ridiculous. Just a fantastical statement divorced from reality. Who is this enemy Europe is facing that will require a ww1 style meat grinder of 10s of millions of troops, which of course took place when the european population was half the size.

Yes, they are an absurd set of assumptions.

I told you what the requirement was. Money. You have simply arbitrarily decided instead it's just people for no reason at all. As though magically people will spawn resources from their finger tips. According to you the richest countries in the world must be the most populous.

Obviously this is idiotic to even a cursory examination.

The next assumption you've made is that birth rate is completely random, a roll of the dice, an unchangeable fact of the universe. The reality is of course it's a result of policy and economics. This can be solved extremely easily.

This is because of globalisation. It's cheaper to use their labour. The alternative is the EU using its military might to oppress other nations.

This is an absurd set of assumptions that have forced you into a nonsensical position.

No, you don't need to accept migrants. You need money. You can get money in many many ways.

The best way for this to happen for the general prosperity of citizens is for the state to enrich themselves from the work of others, non citizens, and give that money to citizens. This is what Norway has done through its sovereign wealth fund.

This is not remotely racist. It's simply a fact, and the result of a lack of nationalist ideology.

Turns out if it's more economically efficient to simply import skilled workers, or outsource, then that's what will happen. Breeding and educating your own citizens in a first world country is very expensive. So you don't do it.

The only reason not to do this is national preference. Economically it makes sense, on a national level it makes sense, individually it's genocide.

Google can also answer it better than most if explicitly asked.

An explicit query returns a specific answer, but means nothing about whether it can use that knowledge to create better software.

Yes? Why would you deserve free money?

It's not an interesting point at it. It's obviously idiotic.

You do have a choice, you can change things. Getting angry, especially in large numbers, is a prerequisite to change. Because getting angry is the prerequisite for violence.

His statement is "ignore getting fucked in the ass and take it". How exactly is that interesting?

There is no tech created like this. This is a literal thinking machine. And it replaces other thinking machines. You.

There is only one way to measure a persons value. their economic output.

If you want to measure something else then measure something else.

>less intelligent people aren't worth less than more intelligent people

Yes, they obviously are? Just an absurd thing to state.

Innovation is not correct.

Extracting maximum profit is correct.

Please for the love of god, try to extrapolate.