RoqueNE
Joined 9 years ago
Karma
-9
Submissions
3
Member since
Dec 21
Recent submissions
Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
How does the fact that he is not invested give him the right to spread false informations and throw dirt? When i see bullshit, i call it out. simple as that.
My opinion is as good as his. But my sources are much better and reliably researched and obviously not biased.
Comment · 9 years ago
Wonder why you only post the old negative articles. There are maybe 5 articles that claim they found something negative, but 20 that are positive or directly debunking the negative articles using credible professional sources.
The nonsense about the 'vulnerability' neha found got destroyed in multiple answers. either directly from the devs or from independent sources.
Just yesterday one of the core devs answered (again) to the claim by narula: https://medium.com/@comefrombeyond/cfbs-comments-on-https-ww...
Your post shows the classical signs of a FUD-Attack. Excellent explained in this article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201.... Here is IOTA as Victim of ongoing targeted FUD-Campains identified.
People seem to just see the FUD Articles and think right away "Oh yea, MIT, must be true", without even thinking about checking the sources.
If the old members here don't want to read the other side, okay, but newcomers should not get dragged in this vortex of misinformations.
Seriously people, read all information and you will see very fast that 99% of all posted Anti-IOTA articles are biased nonsense.