RegW
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Luckily I work remote. I'd turn it off again, but my usage is monitored and I don't want to look like a Luddite.
So may be .75x to .8x range.
However, did that evidence really exist? And if it did, was it for something else? Perhaps, the guy just worried about something far more mundane being discovered? We shall never know.
Think Schrodinger's password.
Who needs researchers when you have great AI.
Soon we will all be Wall-E fat people with AI that's there to do anything we can be bothered to think of.
Well that's because decades of bitter experience has told us all that object graphs rarely map cleanly to sets of relationships.
However, I do think that must have been the original idea as tools such as Hibernate tried so hard to obscure the underlying SQL and database. As a result all Hibernate objects have their own particular identity requirements which only made sense to a developer that knows what's going on under the hood.
But then again, perhaps that conscience will convince it that the universe is better off without us.
I'm a bit afraid that although AI is being presented as part of the carrot, it may actually be a shittier stick.
(that they are an ad company (and they don't know what the implication is)).
Sorry, I'm in the UK so I haven't read the article that the author has decided to block my access to.
I thought that PDF was some sort of open standard.