RC_ITR
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
Our current administration ran on a platform of paying criminals who were convicted of breaking laws.
Where's @dang when you need him?
I'm as smart/dumb as anyone else on here and I'm sorry this conversation turned into whatever this is.
For a historic example, you may be interested in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Grain
Maybe try a different example to make your point?
What is your point?
I said 'even in the most cataclysmic scenarios'
Even in the most cataclysmic scenarios, scientists project Sea level to rise 2m by 2100, and most of Florida is above that level.
https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/what-are-best-and-worst-case...
It's intended to make Parliament powerless (when you read the document, I'm sure you saw that part), so, I'd say it became a right wing concept when it was proposed by a far-right political party in 2017 to move Germany to the right.
You may be interested in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
The AfD literally published a manifesto of new and notably more conservative policy goals in 2017.
They do not claim to have the political stance of Germany 25 years ago, they themselves say that they are something new (For example, point 1 is an adoption of Swiss-style direct democracy, which is a notable shift to the right).
I encourage you to think much more deeply than "I saw this meme and it resonated with me," because the same is true of the American Tight, despite Elon's claim (Regan, for example, was very famously against Tariffing Canada).
Nihilism isn't good in and of itself, so I'm not sure what you're arguing society would lose if we actively chose to be less nihilistic.
The things we say publicly actually do matter and the post-modern descent into absurdity and nihilism has tangible negative consequences?
I'm curious what other things you would argue influences an LLM's behavior.
I am also generally one to trust the claims of the people who train the models, though you're welcome to the highly improbable belief that they operate in a fantasy world.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6795021/
Just as a reminder for everyone here, 0.14% of US children (+3x in a decade) are given Human Growth Hormone because they are short. Our government says that being in the bottom 2 percentiles is a medically valid condition to be treated with hormones.
Differentially focusing your emotional response on sex-expression hormone therapy vs. hormone therapy generally is reflective of bias.
Clustering is usually a pretty good sign of doing neither - just because information is free doesn’t mean you shouldn’t synthesize it for yourself.