Recent submissions

Comment · 3 months ago
The only thing that would make me switch is data loss.
Comment · 3 months ago
Counterpoint: Take a look at consumer cellular. I would say it’s drastically cheaper than verizon, at&t, or t-mobile, but the customer support is better than all 3.
Comment · 9 months ago
It seems like if ChatGPT had literally any other way to turn a profit, they would have done it before resorting to this. Kind of fees like this is their last ditch effort to show investors that they can somehow become profitable.
Comment · 9 months ago
Glad to see my sense of humor lines up directly with 18th century dock workers
Comment · 9 months ago
Yes in that case there would be no data transmitted, and no risk.

Another example: if the user turns off "Turn on when Windows starts up" or whatever equivalent, this would also be a non-issue.

Comment · 9 months ago
The Alaska Mint is the only link I clicked that still worked
Comment · 9 months ago
Is the idea that hackers can review the source for vulnerabilities?

I would imagine any internet-facing application would not have any issues with a source code "leak" like this, as all inter-app communication is based on short-lived credentials.

Comment · 9 months ago
Comment · 10 months ago
> Nobody wants a computer. They want what it does.

This is exactly why we have AI assistants in the first place.

The typical person wants the damn phone / computer / tablet out of their life, they just want to say "Siri, make my dentist appointment for 9:30 Monday morning" or "Copilot, find all the pictures of my dad and put them together in a collage for his birthday".

The biggest problem with AI assistants and this thought process in general is that they do not work.

As the article states, if the AI assistants actually did things we wanted, these companies wouldn't need to shove them down our throats so much. We would just... use them.

Comment · 10 months ago
Agree on it being AI, but what really screamed "AI slop" to me was the emojis. I don't know any tech bloggers who use emojis, but everything that ChatGPT or Gemini generates always has too many emojis.
Comment · 10 months ago
> public WhatsApp API

There is no public WhatsApp API. You need to sign up for "WhatsApp Business Platform" to be able to use an API to interact with WhatsApp.

If there was a real API for WhatsApp, this probably wouldn't have happened.

Comment · 10 months ago
I've used [batch editing in GIMP before](https://github.com/alessandrofrancesconi/gimp-plugin-bimp), to resize a folder of images, so the feature is there. Granted it is a plugin, not a built-in feature.

I do agree though, even the revamped UI does not have a great look and feel, but I'm used to it so I don't mind.

Comment · 10 months ago
> Despite Linux, llvm and Blender proving that open source can beat closed source, GIMP has failed for a very long time.

As a GIMP / Inkscape user who hasn't used photoshop / illustrator, what is so much better about Adobe's offerings?

Comment · 11 months ago
Consent and convenience. When I use google maps, I am trading my privacy for accurate directions and traffic times. When I buy a car that sells my location, and I get nothing in return, I feel like the deal is inequitable.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton