Probuin
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
May I decree that women do not need social media to have love or happiness so it's ok to ban it, under threat of imprisonment if they access it?
Is anything arbitrarily open to prohibition if it doesn't meet your extraordinarily high bar of being the "keystone of mental wellbeing"?
What sick joy do you derive from depriving peaceful lonely desperate men this one small outlet? It's misandry.
All porn disgusts me and yet your cruelty and total lack of empathy is so repugnant that, unbelievably, I'm here batting for coomers. Bravo.
I can't identify a victim in this scenario. Whose business is it? I genuinely couldn't care less if someone did this "to" me, but then I recognise that as a middle aged dude that's not ever happening so I may have a blind spot here. How would I even know unless, ironically, the investigation and prosecution publicised the fact that it exists?
This article even touches on it, for example, in that just possessing deep-faked porn is punishable by up to 3 years imprisonment. There are many men who will literally never experience a woman's touch, are shunned, isolated, ridiculed, shamed, and even hated by society. They are not bad people, their only crime is not being attractive. Who are they hurting if they get their rocks off privately fantasising about a woman with the help of AI and image editors? It's downright cruel.
>in September, legislators passed an amendment that made possessing and viewing deepfake porn punishable by up to three years in prison.
This is insane.