PiRho3141
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
The latest deepseek v4 pro model is 2-5x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Cursor's Compose 2.5 that was just recently released is 6x cheaper than Sonnet.
The state of the art models are going to get better and more expensive and smaller models are going to get cheaper.
There will be a point where the intelligence of both the cheap and state of the art models are indistinguishable by humans like it is indistinguishable for me to understand the difference the difference between Terrance Tao and my university math professor.
I don't always need the smartest and most expensive models. I will need it every once in awhile and will gladly pay that price if I had to. What I do need is the model that will solve the current problem I have in a reasonable amount of time.
https://chatgpt.com/share/70af56e3-2fde-4dab-8b59-d05960dadd...
Just asking if there's a problem and asking Chat GPT to rank the error leads the memory leak error to be categorized as low criticality though.
https://chatgpt.com/share/68eb706a-05eb-44ca-8e2b-abc97c0422...
Pretty promising though that it was able to point out the problem even without pointing it out and it definitely caught the memory leak issue.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was able to figure it out right away without pointing it out though.
Principal payments (part of the mortgage the tenant pays goes into the principal of the property--usually around 30% of the first payment goes to principal if you put down 20% and it only goes up from there
My philosophy of being a landlord is not to bank on appreciation, but rather find houses where the mortgage is well below what tenants are paying for. How do you find those kinds of houses? You buy dilapidated houses, renovate them and then rent them out. If you don't want to go through that work, there are middlemen called "turnkey providers" that renovate houses and then sell them to investors for a profit.
From there, you can decide whether to manage the property yourself (less passive) or hire a property manager (more passive). If you hire a property manager, they do all of the busy work associated with owning a house like finding tenants, collecting rent, evicting tenants. They do not get paid unless there is a tenant on the property so it's in their best interest to find you a good tenant.
The thing I like most about rental properties is four fold: 1) Positive cash flow (rent minus all operating costs) 2) Depreciation (in the US, you can depreciate the cost of the house--not land--over 27.5 years which usually makes the cash flow stated above tax free) 3) Principal payments (part of the mortgage the tenant pays goes into the principal of the property--usually around 30% of the first payment goes to principal if you put down 20% and it only goes up from there) 4) Appreciation (the house & land usually appreciates at pace with inflation)
Graham Stephan talks about this in his YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8wNUaBgZTk
Also remember, the longer you hold the property, the higher the rent will be while your 30 year loan will stay flat. This makes holding property much more appealing later on but with higher repair bills as well as things start to break.
There's a lot of advantages with owning homes IF you do the math correctly. Here's a video of Brandon Turner, the owner of Bigger Pockets, discussing how to analyze rental properties for the math to make sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uogn4qtZ8U
Also, if there's a downturn in the market, usually people that own homes move to rental properties.
If you're interested in rental properties, I'd suggest the bigger pockets forums where you can read about everyone doing this type of stuff: https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums
With that said, depending on the property manager, they will do some of the following: find tenants, place tenants, evict tenants, collect rent, find contractors/repairperson to fix issues, etc.
The property manager makes it mostly passive but probably an hour a month of work if that.
Way to hit the feelers.
Uber should be partially at fault since they deactivated the automatic emergency braking.
Yes, I agree when vehicles become fully autonomous, people will be less attuned to the environment, but in this case, the person was hired specifically to pay attention at all times.
https://news.sky.com/story/uber-safety-driver-charged-over-d...