Pedro_Ribeiro
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
I also see TypeSafe adopted Dagger which is awesome and hopefully inspires more confidence in the rest of the community. Best of luck!
Congrats on the launch, I'm a happy user of Dagger. One use case I've found for it besides CI was building an eval sandbox for testing different coding agents' performance using CLIs, APIs, and coding tasks.
It helps a lot with layering different permutations of dependencies (i.e. test Claude Code vs Codex vs Pi, or forward port access to the docs or no docs access) and you also benefit from the layer caching so evals take a lot less time.
One piece of constructive criticism I have for Dagger: while the API and CLI are beautifully made, the documentation and the webapp scare the normies and could be improved. I've also had some trouble with outdated documentation in the past but I'm sure 1.0 is meant to be a turning point in that with the new docs rework and all.
You'll see the stock go up when Robotaxi and the Semi hit the market.
This on the other hand has actually kind of swayed me over? I think it's still a massive net-benefit for society but I resonated a lot with the author's feelings and I want to understand how to cope with them myself, perhaps by joining groups of people who are still interested in pure software (which AI is a part of now).
The -30IQ line in particular reminded me of DHH's ramblings on Twitter the past few days.