Panoramix

How do we know the formalization itself doesn't have any errors? AFAIK it's very far from trivial to formalize something.

This is lovely

It's explained in the video. They target <1 second.

Do you have a citation for that?

I guess nobody clicks on the links anymore? From the OP: "Our multi-mode fan and ground sealing system acts as a downforce generator, pulling air out from beneath the vehicle. This provides enough suction to hold the vehicle upside down, even when stationary. Powered fans and active wings maximize traction and cornering speeds in all conditions, achieving massive downforce at zero speed. A next-gen steer-by-wire system offers incredible feedback in various road conditions. Activate Track Mode to lower the car and transform the suspension. High downforce or low drag modes can then be used as needed on the track."

Sure. But no European company is ordering more than a few DUVs at a time

The logic is backwards. The research was already there, so ASML licensed it. If the research wasn't there they would have developed it, and/or find another way to make it work using a somewhat different tech. This is but one of the dozen large technical issues that needed to be solved en route to EUV.

Also, if you start now you would not compete with TSMC in the coming 20-30 years, so the energy requirements won't be that high off the bat

And about 300-400 DUV machines a year

Your point is largely addressed in the article, did you try reading it? "In many fields and activities, years of training have traditionally served not only to produce a final answer or product, but also to develop understanding and the ability to formulate new questions and ideas. However, building on a vast body of previous human work, AI systems are becoming increasingly capable of producing the results of such work directly, and these goals cease to align."

The point is that these proofs are largely useless without the insights. The value of a proof is largely in the travel, not so much in the destination.

Yes, that would be par course with OpenAI behavior

To me the bottleneck is not even the compute, which is an issue for sure, but the data. All these large companies got their hands into petabytes of data, a lot of which of illegally acquired, but now they are large enough to pay the fines.

I mean it kind of makes sense that the people that caused the problem don't even see the problem. That's an explanation onto itself.