Others
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
I think if you’d rather read about the downfall of the Culture, then you’ve somewhat profoundly missed the point of Ian’s writing.
2. Make sure the amount of process matches the amount of complexity. If the change is very simple or only a few lines, make it trivial to submit code changes that will pass review. (So have really good automated style checks/test suites.) If the change is complex, make sure you’re doing design reviews before implementation, to ensure the away team doesn’t waste time with bad implementation strategies
Open-source model works for libraries, or small changes in service code (where the maintenance burden is trivial). But it doesn’t work for complex services with high maintenance burdens
Also the rationals are countable by diagonalization.
If it’s happened to you please call customer service and complain. If they can’t fix it or refund you, please get in touch with me and I will try and get it fixed for you
Except the “you can’t see the track” one I suppose :P
In fact if the west could target everything except oil, they probably would (since that’s the most critical export that Europe needs).
Your overall point still stands though. Your argument is strong. It’s not practical for Russia to simply redirect their flow to maintain “business as usual”.
That’s not necessarily true, since many people around or below the poverty line rely on government assistance to survive.
Also, the federal minimum is so low and our social safety net is so weak (virtually non existent), many people would be instantly screwed by any sort of drastic/expensive event. (Like unexpected illness or the loss of a job or a car accident.) Is a wage livable if you can’t live through times of trouble?
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/peach; my proof: https://keybase.io/peach/sigs/vvRgNs-IaMSuxB1De1oulrRMYXN7jdyWf764wxbjo3k ]