Osiris
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
95 and 98 and ME crashed on a regular basis. I specifically remember upgrading from ME to XP and being so happy with the massively improved stability of the NT kernel over the 9x kernels.
If you think that's 9x was stable and reliable, you may be thinking very nostalgicly.
You can do nearly everything the website does entirely in the terminal.
Their solution didn't address any of the goals of the injunction.
IANAL.
If there is literally no documentation up until the final moment, doesn't that itself act as evidence that they were consciously and deliberately not wanting their reasoning documented?
Why not just do the right thing. Damn.
1. Any fines for not complying would be less than what they would lose by complying
2. That no individual would suffer any consequences for blatantly disobeying a court order.
In my opinion, the whole concept that a company can break the law but no human can be held responsible is insane.
I really hope that criminal charges are brought against those involved in making a conscious choice to both lie to the court and ignore the court order. Hopefully that will make other executives think twice when put in the same situation.
"Can not" means "not possible", but it's clearly possible.
This allows them to offer a free "plan" without incurring the hosting costs of providing the service.
It's not reasonable to make a blanket absolutist statement like that.