Okkef
Joined 19 years ago
Joined 19 years ago
I think the bigger problem is that big AI PR's need a different way of reviewing. For example, the order in which the diff's are shown can make a big difference in how easy the commits are to read (e.g., function definition change first, then all call sites, then the tests).
Or maybe we should go to a system where diffs & comments are intertwined, a bit like how "Literate Programming" intertwines code and prose.
Literate diffs / literate pull requests... I haven't found anything like that yet.
Pre-commit hooks are not possible [yet?], which is a minor inconvenience. Worse, workspaces/worktrees use a different mechanism. This causes like Claude Desktop (which uses worktrees) to break. Also Claude and other agents are always confused about JJ and fall back to git too often.
After you tried it, come back.
Claude Code could code all the Claudes Claude Code could code, because Claude Code already coded the Claude that codes Claude Code.
Or more philosophically: The answer is recursively infinite, because each Claude that gets coded can then help code the next Claude, creating an ever-improving feedback loop of Claude-coding Claudes. It's Claudes all the way down!
Antirez' blog (of Redis fame) https://antirez.com/
Simon Willison's blog (about AI) https://simonwillison.net/
The choice was
2016 100k km Golf Plus for 16k eur
2020 50k km e-Golf for 13k eur
I'm so glad we picked the e-golf! It's so fast and nice to drive and cheap to run. Only downside is the limited range (200km on a summer day) but even my commute (100km one-way) is OK as I can charge at work and home.That said, we still have a Touran for when we need to drive further or with lots of luggage.
If only the chairs in the eGolf were a bit better...
What are you up to today? Any blockers? What do you need help with?
Thanks but no thanks.