NooneAtAll3

I'm gonna ignore that you sound like paid actor who didn't even read what you're answering to

But what I am am complaining about is not *Ai* - I complain about Ai *companies* and their bad faith marketing tactics as of late

It doesn't matter whether security flaw exists or not if you fail at the very basic communication skill of "keep secret stuff you agreed to keep secret, secret"

your suggestion is like answering "emigrate" to every complaint about your government

it is a solution, even valid and preferable one - but simply stopping the ones doing wrong will be better

"accidentally"

I feel paranoid enough now to blame ai companies to try to induce panic and proclaim "buy our product to save yourself"

I don't understand, how is this connected to Linux?

Why is it on linux news blog?

this isn't the first time I see "I have not actually read the paper" take.

Previous time it was "I don't care about ai papers by default, so who cares"

either way it's not good to not even try and to "proudly" put your lack of effort front and forward

Ai fumbles responsible disclosure*

replace "corals" with "temperate forests" to realize the scale of affected animal populations/species

corals are along the coasts all around the tropics and they are food chain, from plants to herbivores to predators

so funny to start the article with "Interop that all compilers unite to implement together" and then proceed to show features available only in one browser

there are dozens of us! dozens!

what about deepseek?

> SpaceX does the whole rocket launch thing for a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle

no?

cost-per-launch is about equal, it's just that falcon made it to the desired launch cadence to spread cost-per-month around, while shuttle did not

why do you think falcon program is closing as starlink launches are switching to starship?

does anyone else encounter github failing to load dark theme on first load, but working fine after page reload?

> I don't think fusion has any significant chance of succeeding now.

if by "now" you mean schedules proposed by all those fusion startups, then you should've known better the moment they became "viral" in a very fake way (same for quantum computers)

for a more serious timeline, ITER is coming online early 30s, add a decade to get to more-than-even tokamak and another decade for something "commercial"

and by then it will be just in time to support operations on the Moon, I guess