Niten

Yes and like every good conspiracy theorist knows, the inability to point to evidence is all the more proof of the conspiracy.

Leave. You're a net-negative to this website.

Your "blah blah blah" comment below really speaks to your level of sophistication, on this and I'm sure other topics too.

You have no place in polite society. Get lost.

Additionally, it's crucial to recognize how Hamas's health ministry numbers never distinguish between combatant and civilian deaths

This is dangerously unhinged hyperbole. What comment by DHH says that you, personally, don't "belong in public spaces"? Be specific.

> One person who was a major funder of RubyCentral pulled funding because they were upset at RubyCentral platforming DHH

Yes. To de-obfuscate, they sent a message that he should be cancelled. It backfired spectacularly, as it rightfully should have. Good.

Why should one trust her? What's her full name and the reason for deferring to her expertise?

And yes I'm aware her posts have made it to the top of HN many times in the past. That I've seen, they've all been unhelpful vague-posts like this one.

Maybe she's actually a real expert I should be listening to! But layer upon layer of vague "if you know, you know" do not make that case.

> The article you linked to is pure propaganda - Hamas' charter changed a long, long time ago

No, it's not "propaganda". It's factual reporting that happens to be inconvenient to Hamas apologists.

It's also corroborated by the atrocities against innocent civilians that these monsters gleefully filmed themselves committing on October 7th, such as attacking children with grenades.

Is this a principle you apply universally? For example, do you oppose U.S. companies providing technical support for Ukraine's justified war aims, such as Starlink?

I've seen no indication that simply protesting is seen as "not ok". But trespassing on private property, or worse blocking bridges, goes quite beyond "protest" and freedom of speech.