Nightshaxx

The whole idea of the product is it strips your IP address.

You will meet plenty of passive aggressive people in your life. You have to learn to deal with them (which admittedly isn't always easy). This article feels like a vent by the author over dealing with this person. It probably encourages the person to make more passive aggressive remarks when they see their tweets got the rise out of him they wanted.

The only reason I am annoyed at this article is it seems to be trying to make some sort of commentary on social media. This isn't a social media problem (although SM might exacerbate it), it's a people problem. I wish you luck in figuring out how to better deal with this sort of thing, I have struggled with it too.

This is amazing! The playlist is really great!

I think their tweet got posted here already. Some issues with DNS apparently.

The doctor did not have the _potential_ to fake evidence. He _did_ fake evidence.

I have a pixel but i don't have qr scanning built in to the camera. It was at one point built into the "google vision" thing, but i haven't seen it in the ui for a while.

A murderer kills less than 1% of all the people they meet. Does that mean we should just accept their behavior?

Computers don't act with malicious intent.

I should clarify I meant with random internet people. There are security concerns. Sister comment explains

ok let me clarify. It is really not a good idea to give your password out on the internet, even if the person says they are an employee. When I worked at a company handling user data they had strict rules around this because employees had to be accountable for what user data they looked at and how that data was handled. Someone could use your password, do something harmful, and then blame it on you. It would be hard to prove innocence.

You shouldn't ask for someone's password, no matter what the context is. There should be other ways to duplicate or identify the issue, no?

What if the person is using an Android phone connected to a monitor? As someone said in another thread: you design a view for a screen size not a device.

I am a real user of the app and I can confirm my review was reviewed without my consent.

I disagree. In a pandemic it's important to get solid and clear information to the population. If you start saying things that don't go through the proper channels to be verified as reasonably true, then you create massive confusion when you potentially have to go back on that information. Scientists can and do make mistakes. A lay person might not understand what "preprint" or "not peer reviewed" mean yet this article is on the BBC which the average lay person does trust as a source for reasonably true information.