NeonNautilus

I don't think punishing people for suing you typically plays well in court. Especially not if you, you know, publicly announce that's what you're doing.

Can anyone else prove this security vulnerability actually existed?

Did Matt really send you here without even explaining what the conversation was about? And then you didn't even bother to read it for yourself?

The article you wrote claims "The Foundation also licensed the name WordPress to the non-profit WordPress.org, which runs a website that facilitates access to WordPress-related software."

Matt in his comment claims "All the information in the links you shared is totally wrong. Our lawyers have never said that WordPress.org is a non-profit or owned by the Foundation."

So which of you have it wrong?