Narew

With macro rust can surely produce some creative stuff

From what I personally tested Ornith-1.0 35B is slightly better than Qwen-3.6 35B. My tests are tasks that consist of adding/modify feature in a big C++ codebase. The part that I find interesting is that the model is way faster than Qwen3.6 35B. It seems Ornith produce a smaller chain of thought. On my test it can be 3 time faster to produce the answer.

I use it via llamacpp and codex-cli.

Disclaimer : I worked at DxO.

DNG is more a container in which you can store lots of different think and not only RAW images.

For example PureRaw output Linear DNG that is not a RAW anymore. In the same way ProRaw is not a RAW image dispite it's name. But yes PureRaw and some ProRaw are compressed internally with jxl.

It's deprecated not removed yet.

There was in the past. Google had Coral TPU and Intel the Neural Compute Stick (NCS). NCS is from 2018 so it's really outdated now. It was mainly oriented for edge computing so the flops was not comparable to desktop computer.

It's more a Slack alternative than a Trello alternative ? Their website is so bad that I had to go to wikipedia to remember what mattermost is.

cxx only support a part of c++ STL container. It doesn't support template and custom container implementation. So no generic, no variadic number of argument, no automatic type déduction etc...

Appart from cxx.rs. I think most binding between C++ and Rust are in fact C and Rust binding. So you need a C API to your C++ library (no template, no std etc...). So for me you can't use C++ library from Rust.

I'm not a front end dev and only use JS stuff time to time for small personal project. There is so much JS framework out there that appear and disappear so fast. I don't know if we can call it innovation. I have the impression they just reinvent the wheel with so little value added. I prefer to keep on React at least it will not disappear the next time I will do some change on my project.

Really nice project!

That said, I do want to point something out: the “Fast (because Rust)” or “Lightning fast” tagline that’s increasingly common in Rust projects isn’t great. Just using Rust doesn’t automatically make something fast — real performance comes from design, algorithms, and benchmarks. These days, whenever I see “Lightning fast” in a Rust project, it makes me think the author hasn’t really focused on optimization, and that the project might not actually be as performance-tuned as the claim suggests.

Some of the distortion shown in the article is call "Volume Anamorphosis". It's a distortion that strongly deform face and person. This deformation is really visible for short focal lens.

Disclaimer: I work for a photo processing software.