MystK

I wouldn't blame AI. A terrible developer using AI becomes a bad developer. A good developer using AI becomes a great developer.

It's definitely worth it if you're on the plans and don't hit the usage limits already. It's subjectively better based on my experience.

Use `npx ccusage` if you're interested in how much it would have costed if you paid by API usage.

That's an interesting perspective. Perhaps in the future, we'll have FSD car subscriptions that also include insurance, so if you're in an accident the car manufacturer will cover everything.

Its very expensive.

Does it really solve for digital trading in untrustworthy markets though? How would the smart contract verify that the event ticket or game code was legitimate? If it was up to the buyer, they could just lie.

I see now that I was too terse with my initial comment. Cedarfjard explained it well.

> there are people who think that the costs could be less under such a system, and thus that a change would end up ”costing nothing” as contrasted with ”costs going up compared to the current system”

Yes the former is exactly what I mean. I've reread my comment and definitely see how it could be misconstrued. I didn't mean to cause confusion, but it was just the shortest way to express that idea.

Not sure why you think that. There are definitely people who think universal healthcare will cost nothing.

If BTC's price is manipulated anywhere, the market adjusts for it everywhere.

If scheduling shifts were better for Uber and Lyft, they would have done it already.

It may be a terrible app, but it's better than the competition. Does that mean it's the best one?

Would you be willing to pay 10% more of your taxes your whole career for this? I'm sure everything wants what you want, but I think the question is at what cost.