Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
It is true. DP always deals with optimization. Just because my car has a radio, doesn't mean my car is a radio.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
All DP algorithms guarantee an optimal result. It's a defining characteristic of DP. BLAST doesn't. I'm really surprised that you're attempting to debate this.
Comment · 2 years ago
BLAST isn't a dynamic programming algorithm. It's not guaranteed to find an optimal solution, unlike a DP algorithm. It has some elements of DP, but that's it.
Comment · 2 years ago
There aren't many useful applications. People who think otherwise are on par with delusional interviewers that feel compelled to ask problems with DP solutions. The vast majority of us will go our entire careers without needing to solve the Towers of Hanoi or the Egg Drop Puzzle.
Comment · 2 years ago
TIL about one of the solvents involved, ethyl acetate, and the fact that it is not good for you. How do I know that my local coffee shop's machine is working correctly and provides only safe levels of this solvent?
Comment · 2 years ago
So they're too lazy to buy stock when they get paid, but not too lazy to sell stock when they get paid?
Comment · 2 years ago
>Every year, those employees get a percentage of their salaries in company stock.

Ok? Anybody can choose to do this if they work at a public company. But what happen if it's mandatory and the stock goes down? Now your labor was stolen at below market rate! Then we will hear "employees compensation should be resilient to market fluctuations."

Comment · 2 years ago
>Why do you want to allow the word "loser" ? I bet most uses are to bully people.
Comment · 2 years ago
The woman in the white shirt, tan shorts only started running because the people behind her started running. She was strolling away from the explosion. Same with green shorts in the foreground. We don't actually see him run, just walking away.

These people have no sense of urgency around danger, or they cannot recognize danger.

Comment · 2 years ago
I'm talking about the people in the video who saw what happened, then very casually and slowly turned and strolled away.
Comment · 2 years ago
I don't understand the psychology of it either. It's like they think that appearing overly concerned about something potentially dangerous is more embarrassing than being killed by something actually dangerous. That or they have lived such safe and sheltered lives that they cannot identify real danger. I don't have any other explanation.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton