MurMan
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/...
The NRX was disassembled and rebuilt within a year. My guess is that Carter and others were lowered from the "revolving door" above the reactor in order to remove bolts as part of the disassembly process. The clothing worn was needed to protect the personnel from being contaminated.
I wish there were more media introspection over how they fueled the hype. To me, the Theranos story of a 19-year old dropout revolutionizing blood testing technology was always suspect.
This is critical for Intel's turnaround. Good to have a CEO that wants to put money into process engineering and capacity than financial engineering to pump up the stock price to meet his personal compensation goals.
The NIF goal was ignition, not continuous power production. The original spec was one shot every four hours. Achieving one shot per day is close.
It wouldn't surprise me if her legal team points our how poor she is. Poor Elizabeth ...
I think the obvious answer is that they have to. The Navy has a lot of technology that needs maintenance at sea. Problem diagnosis requires understanding. We didn't rely on black box replacement.
I had nearly two years of engineering math when I was drafted and joined the Navy. The Navy skipped all of the derivations and went straight to the concepts of limits, derivatives, and integrals. Even some differential equations that describe reactor dynamics. Calculations were limited to algebra. Testing focused on calculus concepts rather than numerical answers.
This produced technicians with the ability to understand how the power plant worked but without the formal math and physics need for power plant design.
The only thing I can offer about how the Navy selects people is that it presents the various training programs early, starting with the recruiters. Certain programs are presented as being most difficult and are described in glowing terms. The challenge was definitely an attraction for me.
My experience too. Do you remember the "skyhook"? We'd return to the barracks after class and find that the guy next to you had vanished without a trace.
My experience is from the Vietnam era and doesn't apply today. I was drafted mid-way through an EE program when I got behind in units. Virtually all of us had similar backgrounds. The Navy had a knack for teaching nuclear physics & math to bright people with a high school education.
The S5W plant that I operated had virtually no automation. Just safety interlocks and a few automatic shutdowns. Everything was analog. The electrical controls used mag-amps: dumb and inefficient, but reliable as hell. Safety was achieved by detailed operating procedures and highly trained crews. We studied and drilled constantly. Most over-qualified group of people I've known.
There's no way that I could describe what it was like at sea in a few lines here. It might make for an interesting HN thread as there are other nuc's here. :-)
Thankfully, we never had to use oxygen candles. Candles are effective only in a small closed space. That would have been a serious emergency.
Murray