Recent submissions

Comment · 13 days ago
Glad I'm not alone.
Comment · 14 days ago
>> It got dominated by brogrammers who judged you by whether you used vim or not, teams of 20 people producing the same output as a team of two, designers doing mockups for absolutely everything and trying to boss the programmers, product managers making mountains of useless documents for everything and trying to boss the programmers, some rando had Scrummaster certification (who doesn't) and wanted to boss the programmers.

That's because word got out that the field pays well but most people who had the sociopath desire to make a lot of money didn't also have the skill to get a programmer job. So they did what they always do: attach themselves to a living host and leech it's blood. In a pond of IT field water, for every fish (programmer) there were at least 20 leeches (project managers, product managers, scrum masters, designers, architects, you name it).

I thought several times why I chose to be a fish and not a leech and the answer was not that it's the moral thing to do or that I'm not that bothered as long as they let me with a little blood left. Rather pragmatically that it seemed safer being able to find and make my own food than rely on finding and sucking out the blood of someone who does it already.

For 20+ years they added more and more blood sucking parasites to the poor fish and now, finally, they eliminate the fish altogether. Fine!

I'm just curious where will all the leeches go. What they'll suck on from now on. Can you suck the blood from an AI agent? The future looks exciting if only to see how the parasites adapt (or die).

Comment · 15 days ago
I don't know who the writer is, but I like this part: "It feels a little like that moment before the tsunami in 2004. Remember how, in Thailand and Indonesia, the ocean drew back from the coastline? People ran out to marvel at the miles of pristine new beach that suddenly emerged, not realising that, far out at sea, a wall of water was building up and would come crashing over them. We’re in that moment now. A towering wall of stupidity is about to inundate us."
Comment · 20 days ago
>> Yes exactly. We have been intermingling since before humans existed. There is no one true people who can claim to own any land because of their race.

Noone owns their land because of their race but because they can defend it. The moment you can't defend it anymore, you're conquered and driven out. And conquering is attempted either naively by armed conflict like Russia in Ukraine or insidious like migrants in EU. My bet is that the first will fail and the second will succeed.

Not least because of defeatists like you!

Comment · 21 days ago
>> There are LLM optimists and LLM pessimists.

And then there are LLM realists ( Read realpolitik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger ).

I hate LLMs to the bone and am a master at "people not using the technology can change their behavior to neutralize the impact of the technology". Coupled with an 150+ IQ, I can tell you this technology won't go away. Cynically and pragmatically I use and will use it to the maximum extent of enslaving and eliminating the drone of drones who worship it. Go ahead, replace your mediocrity and lack of critical thinking with something that surely won't spit you out in a ditch a few years from now!

Comment · 24 days ago
>> practically nobody writes code by hand anymore, working with 5-10 agents more common

What bubble are these people living in?

Comment · 26 days ago
>> Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI

Morții mătii the ones who downvote. I guess ‘bad things’ for you is an abstract concept rather than a Lubianka cell that can happen to your sorry ass.

Comment · 26 days ago
>> Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman.

I'll revert to vernacular Latin.

Futu-ți Dumnezeii mătii! So "let them eat cake!" you say.

Anafura, Cristoșii, Biserica, Dumnezeii (și) Evanghelia! (ABCDE!)

Comment · 26 days ago
And heading straight for Idiocracy, both in terms of dollar value and average worth of human IQ post-AI era: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

Not only Star Trek were visionaries!

Today's AI is a lot closer to how dumb me was imagining computers back in 1985, when I had my first interaction with a Romanian clone of ZX-Spectrum in the school's newly equipped computer science laboratory: https://retroit.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/IMG-20200707-2...

Must say, I was quite afraid to even press the keys at the time! My brothers, many years later, had an epiphany on why that was. You see, I was a countryside boy. I grew in a world where becoming a tractor driver was a sought of career. Thing is, a tractor is a mechanical contraption. And you know what mechanical contraptions have in common? You can't just pull levers and push pedals at random without knowing what you're doing and expect the thing to work, au contraire! You'll break the expensive damn thing.

So my first interaction with the KEYBOARD of the Home Computer '85 was overly gentle - which probably helped because they were shit.

But beyond that, nobody told me what computers are good for and I could only imagine they could help me solve the numerous math problems that were left as "exercise" in the textbooks that gave two helpful examples "1+1 = 2" and "1-1=0" and then posted the problem without the answer: "now prove the Fermat theorem!"

Fuck math and fuck the educational system! The only purpose of those textbooks, just like AI, is to provide me with WORKING examples from which I can LEARN. That's the whole point of living, learning to solve increasingly harder things so eventually YOU can be the frontier. And no AI will take that from me, they are just glorified textbooks.

Comment · 27 days ago
>> People somehow forget how the Turing test was considered the definitive way of showing something to be "human-level consciousness".

People somehow forget that the original Turing Test was designed to compare two participants chatting through a text-only interface: one AI and one human. The goal was to spot the imposter. Today, the test is simplified from three participants to just two: a human and an LLM. This changes the test from a comparison to a judgment.

Stop spreading misinformation and partial truths!

Comment · 28 days ago
>> How are you preparing your children for an AI-powered world?

Gently introduce them to the realization that death is inevitable.

Comment · 1 month ago
>> They then charge you $1000 for that 10 seconds of work. Given that I have felt ripped off by many lawyers, I’m totally fine with that industry getting disrupted.

Ahh, the salaryman lament against contract workers (plumbers, car mechanics, lawyers etc): he makes $25/hour, why don't they charge similar or less?

Because unlike you, who get a steady stream of money even if only sitting on your ass, these people only make a living if someone calls them and asks a job done. If lawyers would charge per effective time spent as much as you would deem negligible on your side, they'd have to work a construction worker job to make a living and do lawyering on the side./

Comment · 1 month ago
>> The original Turing Test was designed to compare two participants chatting through a text-only interface: one AI and one human. The goal was to spot the imposter. Today, the test is simplified from three participants to just two: a human and an LLM. This changes the test from a comparison to a judgment.

Didn't know that. Good to know.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton