Marthinwurer

Hazard Lee on YouTube has a great video going into the new system they have for fighter pilots to pee in their planes.

With solid motors lower in the atmosphere with high velocity it's often optimal to delay second stage ignition so that your sustainer motor isn't working against as much atmosphere. So, kinda Max-Q issues, but for performance reasons.

I love these kind of inadvertent measurements. One of my favorite examples is that a sufficiently accurate IMU can get you relatively accurate longitude measurements from the Coriolis effect.

This is basically how Digital ReadOuts (DROs) work on manual milling machines, and I'd assume they use the same thing on CNC machines as well.

Dereferencing just gets whatever the value is of that data type that is at the memory location in the pointer. That memory location is all the data that is in that pointer, all other data on how to use it is in the compiled-in type. the length isn't stored unless you manually store it.

Thanks for the recommendation, I like how they're adapting the pivoting head from the cartridge razors to the ecosystem of the safety razor. I've been using the Henson Razor, which tackles the safety razor skill issue by fixing the angle of the blade when it cuts. I've been pretty happy with it, but now you're making me want to try the one you've shared.

After I decided to start shaving, I tried a few different razors. The benefit of the cartridge razor is that it requires less skill than the safety razor. The pivoting head puts it at the right angle every time. The downside, however, is the increased cost and packaging. There's also the problem that all the razor cartridges are proprietary and you need a new handle for each different blade set. I didn't like that,so I tried using the older safety razor that I had been using for trimming my neck when I had a beard. I ended up cutting myself a lot, especially around the chin. If that was what safety was, I'd shudder to see what I'd look like with a straight razor! I was still looking for something better, so after I had been brainwashed by YouTube sponsor segments for a few months, I finally caved and bought the Henson Razor in the hope its capabilities matched the advertisement. It's a finely machined safety razor, but the craftsmanship and tolerances aren't what separates it from the regular ones: it's the fact that they've designed it in a way that removes the skill requirements. The cutting angle is built in so you don't have to precisely control the pressure and angle of your cutting strokes. I was half expecting it to be a gimmick but I ended up falling in love with the design. I ended up buying a big sampler of razor blades and I've been enjoying trying all of them. Anyways, actually improving products are out there, you just have to look.

I've mostly used it for testing and scripting CLIs. Are there any better ways to do that?

Thank you for that explanation, I was confused as to what was happening with the multiple decoders. That's a wild way to implement a processor front end.

I compare my use of FreeCAD to Stockholm Syndrome. The UI is clunky, fillets and chamfers are inconsistent at best, and sometimes things just break. Larger models are difficult at best. However, it has been getting better. Toponaming is finally being fixed, and the UI is getting cleaned up. If you're using CAD professionally, I wouldn't recommend it. Honestly, I wouldn't really recommend it unless you're willing to learn a lot and figure out how to deal with all the ideosyncracies. But still, deep down in my heart, I love it.

There are several projects that implement the MTG engine and are in active use. Forge and Xmage are the main ones. You could ask their developers how they avoid getting C&D'ed. It's definitely doable and your work doesn't have to be in vain.

You might also enjoy watching "How to Make Everything" and "Blondiehacks"

Edit: Clickspring is fantastic too, his Antikythera mechanism project is just phenomenal.

Alternatively, you should avoid it like you would crack cocaine or heroin, because it's that addicting.

There's very few emergencies that the lock would kill them in if used properly. Since it would only be locked once the shuttle got to space and once it would open to hard vacuum. It would be unlocked before reentry. The only other failure modes that I could think of would be if the lock was unable to be opened or the key was lost. Neither would be the end of the world, as they would have had tools available to cut or remove the lock.

Given that, I'd push for the lock to be part of standard procedure. It can't be a point of distress if it's standard procedure instead of a judgement call by the captain.