Mao_Zedang
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
Instead of saying stassi, I should have explained how palmer was unfairly targeted by people in the tech scene and tech media in the valley who have what most people accept as a very left leaning bias. In an attempt to condense all of that in a single word I can see how that came off in the wrong way. And I can see how the comment from last year you linked too come off the same way, it was an attempt to highlight how science and religion are at odds and how the current political climate is making things like blasphemy laws more likely, and how the substance of the article in a society with blasphemy laws could be consider a hate crime.
I also disagree with you and as you can see from the rest of the comments on this particular post also agree with me that Palmer Luckey was miss treated, I dont see how having an unpopular opinion (is it really unpopular?) is flamebait, it isnt even off topic, one could make the argument that this new venture luckey is involved in is a biproduct of exactly the kind of ostracisation he was subjected too.
As for asking for clarification of your accusation that I have "trolled" in the past, I am actually genuinely interested in which comment you are referring too, So I can avoid making the same mistake. If you think that is meta trolling, I guess I cant convince you otherwise.
Is this not it, I havent tried it.
Surely this means the land has a negative value, and should get a positive tax, seems silly to have liens that are > than the value of the property.
- higher interest rates
- change in government taxation
- inability for people to pay higher rents
- overseas investment
- generous tax incentives where you can reduce your taxable income to zero, "negative gearing"
Seems boomers are to blame.