MRD85
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
As a parent this is doubly so. I know everything my children watch and I don't want them exposed to excessive advertising. I also don't let them watch content on YouTube that has excessive advertising in the show itself. I'll gladly pay money for ad free content that is designed to both entertain and educate.
For example, line 5284 has a 8 inequality operators checking every 4th element (140. 144, 148,...). A single "blocks[1][y][x] % 4 != 0" would remove them all. There also appears to be 3 main segments in that huge block of code (111-118, 119-126, 137-168) which would allow it to be simplified.
A second question: Why is there no comments? Is this common?
At what point do we hold NAB liable for the potential damage they have caused?
Working for others isn't such a bad life if you have the drive to establish a life that you want for yourself.
A home system that uses its own electricity has the advantage of reducing the demand on the grid. A commercial system doesn't.
Consider an obese man looking at a fitness model and saying "I want to look like that". He might never reach it but if he loses weight and becomes fitter and healthier then his effort paid off. He might think he failed but he's landed in a better position. I often remind myself that when I'm doing something I don't want to that I'm paying it forward to a future version of me.
I understand why we should pay for articles but if you enforce payment then you'll see a flood of poorly written click bait and a race to the bottom.