Lomlioto

Depends on who you ask.

For me it sounds good.

For Anthropic it might increase load and make them less money but give them better KPIs.

Someone might want to downvote you because you just state something which is very controversal and you do not add any arguments to your 'empty' comment.

Its hard to even have a discussion because someone else needs to give you enough content like ask you first why do you even think that.

So how do you define AI? LLMs? GenAI stuff?

What is 95%? Does it mean that these 5% are unable to disrupt industries or does it mean for you that these 5% will change the world as we know it but stil 95% of other AI stuff is useless?

I personally think that AI/AGI progress is faster than i expected it, I think its very useful already today, I also think we still need to build a lot of obvious stuff (like proper AI Agentic Platforms), more hardware, cheaper hardware etc. but the way quite clear, but some peple might think the current state is the AGI future people talk about it but I think we will only see this in 4/5-15 years and then it will have disrupted a lot.

Yes + the capability to use this 'world' to simulate outcomes. Thats exactly what LeCun and others are trying to do with world models.

NoMansSky generator misses the complexity of encoding more than just geometry and basic quests but thats one reason why google and others show you machine learning based 'game engines' which allow you to enter these worlds. They are not doing this to replace real game engines, the do this for world research.

The ultimate game is us. Our physics constants :D

I def process more than I want.

Its def a spectrum.

In the easiest look at people like me who complain very quick if something is wrong like to warm to cold to sweaty etc. and others not even ackknowliding it at all

They already send stuff like this up.

We already send up a ton of satelites etc.

So what will reasonable be the payload we send up which makes Space-X a Trillion dollar company?

It will not be Datacenters for at least 50 or 100 years more.

At this point Chinese. They release research papers and big open models.

Then Google. They often show human centric features in their conferences. Like taking better pictures of people with different skin color, helping blind people and giving you more control over ads (while acklowiding that this is a thing).

Then Anthropic for their transparency on their blog and certain things they say.

Then OpenAI. OpenAI def took a dive for me after the Apple alegiations.

Grok and xAI? bottom last. Not wanting to give Elon Musk my data. You know that you can't trust Chinese people but they might surprise you. But with Elon Musk? No character trait which indicates anything trust worthy.

Flip flopping left and right, switching from left wing to right wing (which feels calculated but badly executed) and single handingly hurting people and children around the globe (USAID, Gasturbines at his data centers etc.)

Nope its a lot easier to generate anything with grok than with others.

Its not magic here and is well known.

People online regularly discuss if/when grok gets more or less flexible again as they do react based on media outcry.

And no its a LOT harder to generate anything realted to porn or naked or sexual on any other big well known image generator.

It was CSAM enough that the EU is investigating this.

Why are you muddling the topic?

It started by school kids generating images of their peers.

Researchers and police investigated this -> experts.

People found out (like the researches and investigators) that its very easy to generate this type of content.

Elon Musk himself though absolutly knows about this and how easy is to generate porn. Its his thing, freedom before anything else. Why would anyone tell the richest person on the planet what he can or can't do.

Its disappointing to see that you don't think that the richest person on the planet doesn't need to do more to protect miss use but reframe it like this.

Local protests didn't stop Colossus 1 or Colossus 2.

Local protests also didn't stop Space-X. People around his DCs or Space-X still suffer today.

He had to come up with some magic story. The Payload increased only due to his Starlink. But even then, the payload into space is basically non existend.

2025 was the year with the most payload and its only 5000t.

And for us as human beings, a DC in space is the worst case scenario. This will create a lot of stress on our atmosphere (potential, reentry poisning of our atmosphere with lithium and aluminium), co2 usage and the loose of real resources.

He will send metals into space to burn them later into our atmopshere. Limited resources we as a planet have.

And for what? For a DC? A DC which you can put in any dessert on our planet for cheap energy and not having any neighbours.

Only Edge DCs need low latency, your training clusters don't need low latency to end user, plenty of inferencing jobs don't need low latency either.