LambdaComplex

This is one of those cases where companies unfortunately misalign their interests with yours.

You will never get a promotion for reviewing other people's pull requests.

At least the slop it produces would be deterministic.

Plus Go's function for locking a goroutine to an OS thread was broken to the point where you could not safely rely on it for quite a while.

This writeup reads like it was written by Claude, which makes me immediately question its accuracy.

> Each dot is one code sample; bars mark the median. The split between malicious and benign packages, perfect before the prune, was perfect after.

People do not write like this.

My frustration (on top of what you said) is that DHH is already a multimillionaire. Of all the distros, I feel like his is the one that needs donations the least.

I think your emphasis might be in the wrong place...SQLite for config makes enough sense, but as a config _file_?

> The pattern in who survived is uniform:

Wish I had a dollar for every time I heard this construct from Claude Code.

Does exiting following by resuming the session fix it?

> Ask Fable to conduct an adversarial /ultareview of their PR and send the same wall of text back to them.

This won't help. Your wall of text will just get fed right back into the LLM.

I think most of the people who use the term in the context of Linux desktops don't know the term's origin (or at least don't stop to think about it), so the possibility of it being racist never occurs to them.

What purpose do you have for NAT other than putting it where you should actually be putting a firewall?

Nah, that honor goes to Network Solutions. GoDaddy is definitely in 2nd place though.