KlaymenDK

As others have noted, it doesn't look so fine on mobile, there are a ton of typo's, and the discoverability of some things is lacking -- this latter point is, I think, a really great feature, so please don't make the compressed files self-extracting.

Mind you, I never claimed to be a particularly fast typist on any layout, although I have been touch typing for several decades, and on that note I am just as productive on Dvorak as on qwerty -- but at far lesser expense. That is to say, don't switch for the (mythical?) increased typing speed, switch for the ~30%(!) reduction in finger movement and pleasant "rolling" motions you gain.

True, it's not easy to share computers, be it you using somebody else's machine or somebody else using your machine. The latter can easily be addressed by quick layout changes (again, a pain to get right on Windows but a breeze on Linux), while I find that the former doesn't really bother me so much -- curiously, when I can't touch type (such as on my phone), I am hopelessly slow on Dvorak but quite efficient hunting-and-pecking on qwerty (possibly because I retain training from before touch typing?). The most glaring downside is the situations where keys and shortcuts are clearly laid out for qwerty and won't allow you to remap them (case in point: WASD in games); in reality most shortcuts are easy enough to use regardless of layout (side note: I've always been using Ctrl/Shift+Insert/Delete for cut/copy/paste, so the locations of X, C, and V don't affect me -- but modern keyboards with misplaced or missing Insert keys do).

To answer you question: I very specifically switched during the week before New Year's eve, when I could be reasonably sure that things at the office were slow enough to allow me to struggle through an unaccustomed layout. Honestly, the first days were atrocious, but within a week (so ~35 hrs) I had internalized the layout to a reasonable degree, and within a very few weeks (3? I don't really remember) I was up to my usual typing speed.

I have been using Dvorak almost exclusively for about 15 years now. It's not faster, that's a myth -- but it is much more easy on the fingers: depending on the nature of your prose, you'll save perhaps 30% finger movement. With Colemak, that number is less, but you gain a more comparable (to qwerty) shortcut-key layout.

Obviously, there are all sorts of adversities facing Dvorak typists: native hardware keyboard layouts, limits to the users ability to configure software keyboard layouts (for instance, you may be able to change it on your desktop -- but not on the lock screen!), and of course having to fall back to qwerty on other's devices.

Curiously, on a non-touch-typing device such as the touch screen of a tablet or mobile phone, I'm useless on Dvorak (perhaps exactly because Dvorak was designed for hand-alteration?), so there I'm by far more proficient with one hand on qwerty.

In the end, I think I will settle for showing them both layouts in use at their home, and let them decide which to use. However, @kqr makes a number of very good points, not least the RSI one.

We're hiring front-end, back-end, and full-stack Java and PHP developers, at least 5 positions to be filled. We're a payment service provider [1]. Our business is booming and we need more code than we can presently type! I've linked [2] to an earlier job posting that's still quite representative. Of course we do agile (currently one scrum team, one kanban team) and run our stuff on Linux, and of course you'll get an ergo desk and a laptop and two large displays. On the coding discipline side, you'll see lots of unit and CI testing, peer work and code reviews.