KhanMahGretsch
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Reading between the lines, in these cooling months, sent a chill up my spine.
I'm inclined to describe it as a sort of interrogation technique, you're offering a stimulus (the problem) and aggregating a number of reactions to form an opinion, and open up new lines of questioning. Very delicate work.
I think problems arise when unskilled interviewers present an excessively obtuse problem to the candidate, then read far too much into their responses (this approach is also easily "hacked" by those who've memorised common problems of this ilk). To stick with my interrogation analogy, it's the equivalent of screaming in the suspect's face, noticing that they gulp before shifting in their seat and scratching their face, then deciding that "they must be lying".
Perhaps it would be more effective to have the candidate whiteboard a concept that they are already familiar with, be it a high-level engineering principle or a system/solution they have built in the past. Attempting to solve a problem you have just been presented with AND communicating the solution effectively is a big ask.
Surely a true alpha would declare that scrum and agile are "dead".
I find this to be a useful framework for considering the varying kinds of platonic relationships one can have.
[0] https://stpeterslist.com/the-3-types-of-friendship-according...
The phenomenon is referred to as "Elsagate"[0]; be forewarned, it's pure nightmare-fuel.
You have stated in a common-sense way that ingesting huge quantities of sugar and trans-fats make you feel terrible, and ingesting leafy greens make you feel physically well; not that one should simply eat what their cravings tell them to. As sensitivities to certain foods can manifest themselves in different ways on an individual level, recommending that people pay close attention to the impact that certain foods have on their energy-levels, mood, and performance is sound advice.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/public-transit-ranking-cities-...