KeepFlying
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Then the data centralization is a nice plus that makes it impossible to go back on.
- Is the dog a service animal required because of a disability?
- What work or task has the dog been trained to perform?
Most of the time the second question will throw off the fake owners.
You can totally have a legitimate service dog for invisible disabilities.
Licenses don't mean anything in the US btw. The law does not require it and having a "license" is meaningless. Sometimes a training organization might vouch for the dogs skills, but that isn't a license and doesn't legally mean anything.
It's a really low bar for a dog to qualify as an Emotional Support Animal. Which is great for people who need it, but is SO easy to abuse.
It only gives permission for someone to live with their dog though. It doesn't give someone any rights to bring their dog to restaurants and stuff though, even though people try. That's reserved for Service Animals.
Dogs that spend a lot of time in dog parks are way more likely to behave badly when they see other dogs when they are out for a walk.
The rest is on journalists to be sure to mention "Microsoft owned Bethesda" more often.
Without that we delay treatment, increase costs, and slow research. And people die while we wait.
Test what's most likely to be a problem, and avoid wasting resources proving what we already know.
And for my Discover It card a tool like this is t very useful unless it can handle the rotating reward category (I think one of the Chase freedom cards also has a similar program).
I can easily remember most of my static rewards categories, but managing the rotating categories is harder and is where a tool like this would help me best.
Now with it being digital it's too easy to casually find and abuse. The barrier to access is a lot lower.