Jordan_Pelt

I can go to ssa.gov and click the button that says "log into your account."

And the title of the book is "The Fountainhead," not "The Fountain Head."

I'm not so sure. Every so often I browse Metafilter (remember Metafilter?) out of morbid fascination, and it's a total trainwreck. I don't think it's a model for success.

I'm sure she does, but that's beside the point. Why should we pay any attention to the opinions of a person on replacing something he doesn't use with something else he won't use. He may as well say that he won't buy a snowblower because his groundskeeper uses a shovel and does just fine.

"My wife types my work..."

Those five words render the entire essay meaningless.

I'm probably a crackpot, but I'm convinced it's the other way around--matter emerges from mind. The only refutation I'm familiar with is Samuel Johnson kicking a rock, which I don't find very persuasive.

Hank and Hal are also short for Henry.

The only example I can think of is "munchkin" which was apparently coined by Frank Baum for The Wizard of Oz.

An amazing project, and I love that he always calls it "Joan's organ." What a tribute.

...and the opening of the Rush song YYZ.

A chapter in Chemerinsky's casebook on Constitutional law is titled "Speech in Authoritarian Environments: Military, Prisons, and Schools."

That's what I always thought it meant. For example, if a sign says "No Parking 4-6 PM" that proves that parking is allowed there at all other times.

>and computerised taxation (except in the USA).

I don't understand this. Does he not think the IRS uses computers?

I don't know. That's kind of like saying J.K. Rowling couldn't think of just shooting the bad guys with guns.

I "rolled" three times and got a duplicate result. What are the odds of that?