JoeCoder_
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
1. That can be minimized to the system tray.
2. That can be used when behind an http proxy server.
3. Doesn't require a phone to use.
4. Doesn't take 200MB ram to run.
1920x1080 at 3 bytes per pixel and 30 frames per second is 11GB for just one minute of video, and 186MB per second. That's far too big and expensive to stream, and outside of somewhat special circumstances I've never heard of anyone storing video in such a huge format.
Why would you want to losslessly compress audio or video? The resulting files would be huge--often too huge to steam. Lossy compression is what you want.
I must be misunderstanding the article?
When a government agency has a massive failure, we're of stuck with it, short of hoping politicians might do something about it.
"Why all these web workers and why should I care?"
"A: Language services create web workers to compute heavy stuff outside the UI thread. They cost hardly anything in terms of resource overhead and you shouldn't worry too much about them, as long as you get them to work (see above the cross-domain case)."
Maybe that's part of the reason?