Jeff_Brown

Someone in these comments said the paper on Barnette's Conjecture is short. Are any other proofs in this collection short and/or understandable?

Yeah the four samples I heard all sounded kind of formulaic. Too obligated to continue the mold of the last thirty seconds. Impressive and quite pleasant but no big ideas and no thrill of flight.

Could this relate to continual learning? It lets you update without pausing the entire system.

The burning question I can't get any information nn is whether, if they determined an earlier misaligned generation may have transmitted misalignment to the current models, they would roll back to a safe checkpoint to rebuild from there. I suspect they would not unless forced to.

Please elaborate!

The HF hack was a felony.

By itself, "aha" carries no insight, but the insight is probably stated immediately after it. In that case the aha is semantically useful, by identifying the insight it is near.

A question not addressed here is whether there exists any solution to the EU requirement that doesn't suck.

If the same red/green algorithm described in the article is applied to generated code, I cannot imagine how that does not degrade code quality (probabilistically, not at every point).

I love it. I wish I could select materials.

Yes -- power without trust is of no use.

One of the Voyager probes measured the density of the interstellar vacuum at 80,000 protons (and the same number of electrons) per cubic meter. A proton going through a piece of aluminum foil delivers a roughly constant amount of energy regardless of speed; a relativistic proton will pinch through and carry most of its energy with it.

(No punchline; I just think that's cool. I understand that the real problem is the rare dust grain, not the ubiquitous gas.)

I suspect load-bearing is a euphemism for 'not garbage'. Ad in 'most of what you said I can mostly ignore'.

This reminds me of when a friend saw that someone had Liked something he had posted online, and he wanted to Like the Like. There was no interface to do that, so he was "reduced" to merely liking it in reality.

The idea that a producer is at fault and not also the consumer paying them to do that is strange to me.

Can anyone find (or draw) a picture of the construction?