JackOfCrows
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
One of the issues with academia and academic training is it defines intelligence very narrowly. For example, it teaches people that simply having the right answer (or even just saying the right answer) is enough to be "smart". And then these smart people get out in the world and struggle because they learned a lot of "correct answers" but they didn't learn bigger things like: how to solve a problem, how sometimes people don't like you when you seemingly have the correct answer, how to account for all sorts of things you don't know outside the confines of a test question or assignment, or how to get the social buy in to actually do the correct thing (because "people liking you enough to do what you suggest" can be just as important as actually knowing what to do, if not moreso).
The other thing is the academic environment teaches a competitive intelligence but in many business situations you need many kinds of intelligence. If you are not good at sales but you're selling something, a social butterfly sales person can make or break you. An actual project manager that knows how to run a project can be worth more than gold. An accountant can keep your books better than you can even if you are broadly better at math in general because tax law is its own thing.
Further, intelligence overall isn't broadly applicable to many areas. Think of the doctors and lawyers who don't know how to open a PDF or the many programmers who blow off license agreements and legal documents until they get sued.
Academia gives you a narrow definition and scope of intelligence. The world is much more complicated.
2. Remembering when I was a lad in the late 90s that there was a common thread of wisdom that all the IT and techie and programming jobs were just going to be outsourced to India anyway so everyone was doomed.
Hell, you don't even have to go that far back. Remember when we were all going to be working and playing in the Metaverse on our fancy headsets after the bigbrains all went to Burning Man or whatever and came back talking about it and then decided nope?
Also I can't wait for these same articles about AI everything.
A few SV types hit the lotto, some do well for themselves, all of them make LinkedIn posts about how all you have to do is hustle and stay on your grindset mindset (because you never hear about all the people that fail, of course), etc. And one day you too will be rich and successful.
Leaving out of course it's extremely helpful if you already come from a rich family like so many "self made" Silicon Valley types.
They want to integrate it into desktop PCs? Lel. I did some training courses grad school classes and a lot of kids do literally everything on phones and tablets and maybe a chrome book. They use chatgpt to cheat and write papers because it's easy but nobody is using it for the kind of things starry eyed dorks are imagining using it for.
Nobody actually wants this except nerds and VCs trying to find the next gold rush. It's fancy spellcheck/suggestion/guessing and nobody gives a duck. I work with normies and half my team doesn't even have a modern enough smart phone to install recent apps. One guy just has a flip phone because he doesn't want to be bothered.
Remember how SV was pushing the Metaverse a couple years ago and now we all wear headsets and work in our Metaverse office using our NFT avatars with no legs? Exactly.
Silicon Valley isn't even worried about solving problems anymore except "the problem is I don't have enough money and I'd like to fix that". Nobody outside San Francisco and Austin is yearning for a fancy chatbot.