ItendToDisagree
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Also, regardless of the level of criminality, driving infractions can be/are selectively enforced. Being pulled over for being distracted can quickly lead to being arrested for some other offense, or for the police to search your car, or even for them to claim you were aggressive and shoot you dead.
Just because there have not been actual convictions for said offenses does not mean they are not prosecutable. Depending on the state, simply interacting with an electronic device while driving (to change the station for example), can be a punishable offense.
All investments are not owned on the back of consumption foregone in the past.
Unless you believe that someone with 100 million dollars is "foregoing consumption" when they invest (particularly in real estate).
NOT EAT: Fluffy puppies Anything with High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) More than one drink that contains calories on weekdays
Never mind that actual healthcare costs are more expensive than in other countries on a pill by pill and procedure by procedure basis.
Healthcare cost in the United States isn't about liberal or conservative or progressive or whatever label. Get over your tribal blame game.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-an-...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/03/26/21-gr...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/health-costs-how-the-us-...
Whisper campaign to erode public trust and increase partisan divide while diverting attention from more important matters.
If it WAS interference by any nation state (Russia or not; uncovered or not) it seems to have been pretty successful right?
I'd say my posts were drenched in bias from the very start. I'm amazed you missed it ;)
Comcast appears to be using patent troll level fuckery in an attempt to further their goal of stopping net neutrality. A goal, which itself is about controlling the flow of information, and mirrors this attempt to control information.
Attempts to control (like turtles) go all the way down.
2) If Manafort, Flynn, Sessions, etc had non-shady dealings with Russia you would think they wouldn't have to be so shady about how they present those dealings. Sessions wouldn't have to explicitly commit perjury in front of the Senate to try and hide his interactions with Russian officials if they were normal interactions.
3) If you're taking large amounts of money (say for real estate deals) from Russian state banks and oligarchs you're playing a dangerous game of being in someone's pocket.
/snark
While Germans are a bit more conscious of driving in the left lane when not passing, what you are saying neither makes sense, nor is it applicable, especially in any amount of traffic.
It also totally discounts the vast amount of road construction and maintenance that Germans continually do on their roadways (infrastructure maintenance is a big deal). The construction alone, especially in Hessen/Rhineland Pfalz vastly impacts travel times in ways going 40kmph faster could never attempt to approach.
What large donations from Russia did Clinton receive? Were they comparable to Trump's MANY funding streams from Russian banks? Or multiple of his campaign advisers (not to mention his pick for NSA) having deep Russian ties?
Also wasn't Trump the guy falling all over himself to praise Putin/Russia both on Twitter and in-person? Or explicitly asking for Russia to publish more leaks during one of the presidential debates?
Seems like you have your information pretty mixed up (or simply made up).
Can you post a substantial source for any of your claims?
http://time.com/4433880/donald-trump-ties-to-russia/ (details Trump's many ties to Russia and was written by a Republican to boot.)
Technology is one of those things.