IG_Semmelweiss
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
He was brave and an incredible orator. But not exactly a paragon of virtue, someone who can lead by example, which we really need at the highest rungs of power.
I haven't seen a YT ad in years while in lurk-only mode (no login), which is nice, but I also see cloudflare everywhere , which is not great.
One of the nicer things about LLMs, is that they arrived just in time to erase my dependency in search.
After that, the money is gone.
The underlying problem of high, persistent government spending remains. This isn’t primarily a “tax the rich” problem.
He was really young at the time, with some work experience, but no bonafides. Meanwhile investors in Theranos were hisliteral family members - many were considered untouchable members of high society. The level of pressure he was subject to was incredible, and we was coming from a place where he was most vulnerable.
He is literally the star with morals, that you expect to come out of schools like Harvard etc. Instead we get the Holmes class, the Epstein class, the Blankfeins etc. We have been short-changed.
Makes sense for all the reasons you stated. Curious - would this have been doable for a non technical person pre LLM ?
Truly brave of him to go against the golden geese, despite turning his own family- and even former attorney generals & military officers- against him.
Its all on 4/11/2014.
Also interesting to see how Sunny & Holmes always thought it was Tyler, or the CLIA Lab Director (Adam) plotting against them.... when their scam was just in plain sight of regulators that bothered to actually do the work.
Holmes/Sunny reaction to Tyler's email and to Adam's resignation (Nov 2014) is one of outrage. Using the power inbalance to make their point, is 101 fraud.
For non-perishable things - i.e technologies, ideas, books, institutions - the expected remaining lifespan is roughly proportional to how long they have already survived
Time acts as a filter: what has already withstood a long stretch of disorder is more robust, so the longer it lasts, the longer it is expected to last.
The old nuclear software running on mainframes have passed the test of time. The new software, has yet to.
Nassim Taleb talks about this at length in his book, Antifragile.
As in, the dust/mud particles sprayed & floating in the air do not have the force to do harm beyond vision or breathing impairment, similar to the dust from a collapsing building, or the lead shockwave of a nuclear bomb detonation.
Of course, it looks terrible, and certainly somethingbut its not a reason to perish as long as you can stay away from the following water wall and mud current that does strike sometime after.
there's only noise pollution if there's anyone around. If there's anyone around, odds are land value is too expensive for a datacenter. As for pollution, that's already regulated. As is noise anyway. Lets not be pedantic. No one is protesting these due to pollution or noise.
>>> What? How does one BYO water?
Tankers. Like 95% of the world. Its a thing. This is actually the least likely to be an issue, since most datacenters run a closed loop water system anyway.
>>> Pipes and sewage to where? There's an implied common ground at the end of those.
Porta-potties for humans. Tanker disposal for the rest (to the extent you do have waste).
The faster you get out of the bus, the faster you liberate grandma and kids from a fall, being mugged, or from freezing to death while waiting, and instead you promote an active lifestyle.
Waymo-like transport is incredibly liberating for low middle class parents, that cannot be trust their young kids to ride a bus alone and take time off blue collar work to take their kids to X practice.
Plus, they are much cheaper and safer to operate long term
Buses are a solution today, but only for upper class americans & soccer moms, who don't realize the issues that low income or limited fixed income seniors face in their everyday life.
>>> The current F.B.I. director, James Comey, keeps a copy of the King wiretap request on his desk as a reminder of the bureau’s capacity to do wrong.