HenrikB
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
It only happened when there were too many callers at the same time. The solution was often to redial and hoping you ended up with a non-satellite call.
In this case, I'd interpret it as they made up a new licence based on MIT, but their addendum makes it non-MIT, but something else. I agree with what others said; this "new" license has internal conflicts.
There are also public and proprietary "aviation obstacle" databases across the world.
Many projects have great communities, making it all fun and engaging.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_(...
You did it in a pitch dark room, aimed the camera towards the teve, and have someone briefly light a lighter in between. That generated a visual feedback loop.
By rotating the camera upside down, the feedback loop would introduce systematic effects, because the camera's vertical scan is now opposite to the teve's swipe. It would create random, constantly changing, colorful, spiraling patterns.
You could move your hands in front to adjust the patterns and control the brightness that could increase due to the feedback loop.
Stunning, cool, and fun.
I read a long time ago that it's quite common, like 1 in 7 people got it. Some people don't even know they have it. I always had it as far as I can recall, but it wasn't until my mid 20s, when I stumbled upon a picture, that I reflected on it and the fact that not everyone sees number forms.
There are chips produced in 2015 that are only supporting x86-64-v2 [0]. Also, according to [1], "The new server-class CPUs released in 2020 [2] do not implement the AVX instruction set."
FWIW2, RedHat Enterprise Linux 9 (RHEL9) requires x86-64-v2 or newer [1]. So, as a reference, they decided to not yet require support for AVX.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Microarchitecture_level...
[1] https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/01/05/building-red-h...
[2] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/pro...