HNaTTY
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
I dropped 20 lbs off a 330lb bike (and added about 5hp) by replacing the heavy dual exhaust with a single Ti/carbon pipe, and reprogramming the ECU. I'm sure the manufacturer would have loved to give me a 310lb bike that made more power if they could. (and before you ask, no it's not loud, I hate loud pipes)
Incidentally, the exhaust/ECU upgrade was done by the local shop when the bike was purchased new. Basically the same as what H-D was doing.
Anyway, what H-D got popped for is arguably less egregious than what VW was doing. They admit that the modified bikes bypass emissions requirements, whereas the unmodified VWs didn't meet the requirements and had to cheat to pass inspection.
These people are wasting energy and these super-powered CPUs are a potential fire hazard and we need better regulation enforcement now!
If we restricted high-powered CPUs to people with a license and a documented need, the world would be a safer place for me.
...In all seriousness, 1hp is not serious shit. And motorcycles are significantly faster and more dangerous.
The bike you linked has a 250w motor. Running it at 100% for an hour, if you were able to average 12.5mph for that time, that gives you 20wh/mile.
Based on the watt-hours we calculated earlier, and the manufacturer's claim of 30 miles, we have to assume they're figuring 25mph at 250w of power. This is technically possible according to (http://www.analyticcycling.com/ForcesSpeed_Page.html) but clearly we're in "best case scenario" land.
A land-based launch system would have a lot of advantages; lower peak power would be needed from the motor and batteries, the engines could be made smaller, the energy used to take off doesn't have to be stored on the plane, everything gets lighter and more efficient.