Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
I'd buy it
Comment · 4 years ago
well said.
Comment · 4 years ago
>It is unconstitutional and wrong, it also sets a precedent, how long before the FBI finds out someone politically unpopular is being "investigated" another nice thing is that once they take your money good luck affording lawyers fees.

I absolutely agree

Comment · 4 years ago
People who are already privileged enough to work from home need more incentive to buy into services they used to use. Idk
Comment · 4 years ago
The pandemic killed a lot of good bets at Soft Bank. The rogue wave was not kind to anyone.
Comment · 4 years ago
Lets see who profits from this
Comment · 4 years ago
This might apply to the argument of cursive over print writing style
Comment · 4 years ago
I cant even access my streaming services without being snooped on per the 'privacy agreement.'

Essentially my tv is bricked outside of traditional cable.

I dont use or set up voice commands but the privacy agreement allows them to store my voice for voice commands without setup.

If I dont agree to the privacy statement I cant use my paid for streaming services.

Life in this century is a total joke.

I will never get another smart tv and I hope the trend dies.

Comment · 4 years ago
>Let's make it very, very expensive again.

That is a small goal of GDPR.

Comment · 4 years ago
Well it will probably be an arms race between time, money, and efforts to mislead all data aggregation. Dealing with paid ideologues will be more difficult and harmful. With the past years hacks I don't see our databases being free of fouling.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton