Recent submissions

Comment · 6 months ago
Who would pay for it when literally every other option has been free for a lifetime?
Comment · 1 year ago
They're not, at all. It was invented by Facebook, but it's literally just a few lines of metadata that applications can choose to read if they want.
Comment · 2 years ago
My guess is that the researchers don't "own" the research they're doing since it was being funded by the university. It's property of the university and if you take it and try to sell it now you're stealing IP.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
It's been awhile since I looked, but when I did a few years ago they had hundreds of subdomains for their videos (both regular and ads) and would rotate what they're used for all the time. That's why its basically impossible for PiHole to anything.
Comment · 3 years ago
Google does some stupid things, but Chromium is "too big to fail" at this point and it's too essential to products like Android which are also at that same point.

But hypothetically if Google stopped contributing to Chromium the project would be forked and it would live on. Frankly, Google removing themselves from Chromium would fix the one major complaint a lot of people have with it.

Comment · 3 years ago
I think Google's answer to that is WebP.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
It had just started to become profitable right before Elon bought it. Granted that’s like 1 or 2 profitable quarters out of dozens, but still counts I guess
Comment · 3 years ago
Wonder how long it'll take for Blink to overtake WebKit on iOS in terms of usage.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton