Flemlo
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
I agree we will see how this plays out but I hope models might start to become more efficient and it might not matter that much for certain things to run some parts locally.
I could imagine a LLM model with a lot less languages and optimized for one programming language to happen. Like 'generaten your model'
And I have worked in plenty of companies I'm the open source guy in these companies and me or my teams never had the capacity to do so
GenAI just works. People don't need to be pushed using it and continue using it.
OpenAI has 500 Million active users weekly.
Open source of course.
So what's my response to that deprecating? Maintaining it myself? Nope finding another library.
You always depend on something...
200-300$/month are already 7k in 3 years.
And I do expect some hardware chip based models in a few years like a GPU.
AiPU we're you can replace the hardware ai chip.
3D models can be generated quite well already. Good enough for a sculpture.
What I hate is that I will not pay more than 20-50$ per month for side projects and that gap annoys me.
For me a compressed model learning rules through statistics is not statistics anymore.
Physic rules are not statistics.
I don't think I could Mimik a LLM. But I'm prompting fast so that helps
Like knowing multiple languages/ multiple words for one thing.
As soon as compression happens, optimization happens which can lead to rules/learning of principles which got feed by statistics.
The personal assistant agent too.
They might overlap for me but not for everyone.
Nothing will crash. The big rich companies like Google, Microsoft already need it as part of their product strategy.
But about ai companies, I don't think their faith matters at all to end consumer and I'm pretty sure companies like character.ai do not run red numbers.
But do I really have to say colloquial?