Endlessly
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
Having non-essential spaces for people is complete unnecessary — and it: contributes in less health eating habits, traffic, cars, HVAC related energy costs, wasted time commuting, rising real estate costs, economic lost during pandemics due to downtime, etc.
Same principle holds true for non-essential travel.
(50 petabytes * 0.2% = 100 terabytes)
[$0.005 ($/GB/Month) BackBlaze cost]
[(50 petabytes) / (1 gigabyte) = 50,000,000]
(50,000,000 * $0.005 = $250,000 US$)
—————
Meaning based on my numbers, that is $250,000 USD a month to host 50 petabytes of data on BackBlaze.
(1) US coronavirus data in general,
(2) examples of sources that do not log prior days data, or
(3) source that “edit” prior data without noting the edits.
(4) something else
If (1) this page in the table under the column “sources” links to where the data came from:
SOURCE: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ΜClinux
——————————-
How uClinux provides MMU-less processors with an alternative https://www.eetimes.com/how-uclinux-provides-mmu-less-proces...
My 40+ countries came from the same page, not sure why it says 40+.
See the wiki page for more information: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother%27s_Day
Another option might be better to process the text, swap out each letter with for example X — or even better a ID-key, then render the font you made.
If you used the ID-key, you could even encrypt each key, tag them by type (spoilers, swear words, personal info, etc) - though for obvious reasons that would require server-side code.
Claiming the average person is able to understand scope of that document— and the likely 1000s of internal documents related to it, and the 100s of thousand pages of related legal code and case law is a stretch.
Document also does not disclose Facebook is subject to secret court orders, gag orders, etc.
— and that doesn’t even begin to cover the knowledge required to understand the related technology and the impact it might have on the users.
————
Suspended sneak.berlin
TEK 9 MAR 2020 • 1 MIN READ
The sneak.berlin instance is a small or single-user instance operated by a software author who writes hostile instance-scraping bots. On the web page for that software, in the ironically named "ethics statement", he writes:
“Publishing your toots/messages on a server without marking them private or requiring authentication and thus making them available to the web is an act of affirmative consent to allowing others to download those toots/messages (usually by viewing them in a browser on your profile page). If you don’t want your toots downloaded by remote/unauthenticated users on the web, do not publish them to the web.
If you publish them to the whole web (and your home instance serves them to all comers), do not be surprised or feel violated when people download (and optionally save) them, as your home instance permits them to.“
This is an interesting take on online privacy, to be sure: "because you have not physically restricted me from harvesting your information, you are affirmatively consenting to it". This is much the same argument as "you shouldn't have let me hit you" and carries about the same moral weight with me.
By choosing not to talk to this instance, I hope we make clear that the Free Radical community does not wish to interact with the author or his software.
— burner hardware, — one-time network connections, — one-time user accounts, — one-time identifiers, — read-only OS builds, — physically disabling sensors, — (insert suggestions)
What else might be options for securely accessing the event?
What does this mean?
Even a “read only” CD-ROM if not verified on boot for tampering — might contain an attack, including: to just disable the disk from booting, among other things.