EQYV

Please can this not be true..

> because system vulnerabilities are solvable problems

If only…

> I hate that you are reducing my craft to just the end results and nothing else. No value in my expertise or knowledge, all of the hours slogging through blog posts, IT forums, stackoverflow and technical pdfs and you have reduced that to "well what can you build for me?"

Perhaps this comment spells the end of my account but I can’t not say this.

What you can create for your employer is and always was the ONLY reason they valued you. And why would you ever expect anything different? You are not hired for your suffering, your experience, the time you spent learning everything you know OTHER THAN insofar as it helps deliver your employer value.

By the way, I do not think your time has been wasted! Your knowledge and experience are extremely useful to avoid entire categories of problems that a naive LLM-only approach would produce in spades.

THAT, I believe, is what our craft truly is.

This is beautiful!

This is a completely unacceptable vulnerability in any software purporting itself to be an identity provider. OP, name and shame this provider. I do not want to find myself using it.

What do you mean by AI groups in this case?

Sounds kinda like Amazon..

Last I read, RPKI data gets stripped if it passes through an AS that doesn’t support it.. Has that changed?

Very much the same from me. I know +1 posts aren’t generally welcome here but I hope dang can forgive it.

Honest question, why is this your reaction? Why are people on this forum so unwilling to be happy for others? I have noticed that this attitude is extremely prominent in tech. Everything is either perfect (according to the person making the judgement) or it’s utterly worthy of ridicule. I am growing very, very tired of seeing this throughout tech.

I haven’t managed to get the built in tailscale route-through-exit-node functionality working on my router. Have you / others had success?

What about LTT is objectionable?

Well, maybe he shouldn’t but it seems he’d rather not deal with this problem at all and now we have the status quo. That has to be a situation you’re willing to accept, unless you’re saying Facebook should be forced to allow news, and be forced to pay for it.