Deep-States

>They have developed a huge arsenal of coping strategies to avoid improving FreeCAD and the results speak for themselves.

Exactly. These FreeCAD "strategies" you mention align themselves perfectly with the objectives of the legacy CAD industry: To delay; break; and obfuscate opensource CAD.

In other words: The FreeCAD team may not be infiltrated by the legacy-CAD industry, but its behavior is entirely consistent with such a state.

One solution is to fork the behemoth; but if FreeCAD is a hedge-maze-by-design, the only way to win is not to play the game: Build alternatives elsewhere, from scratch.

FreeCAD feels like a time-drainer honeypot. Though whether by accident, or malice, is unknown.

Agreed: The Dune3D developers made the wise decision to start from scratch implementing a parametric modeling UI. Extremely robust software; very fast, and almost intuitive (high praise for CAD).

The problem with FreeCAD, on the other hand, is that it's a "just two more weeks and it'll be great" solution.

The developers are clearly talented in a raw-math kind of way, but FreeCAD offers the eternal promise of usability in the next release; while never delivering it.

Those who are profoundly cynical might consider the possibility that the legacy CAD industry has infiltrated the FreeCAD development team and run Pied-Piper ops there to prevent a Blender-moment stealing their revenue.

This would perfectly explain why the FreeCAD experience is so consistently bizarre.