Dannymetconan
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Non-deterministic behavior via code.
There is no shortcut unfortunately.
What is your point?
| NIMBY-ism.
True but it effects are much worse due to poor planning laws
In an ideal situation we would be seeing a ramp up in production of all types to take advantage of the costs.
This is a policy decision by the government. More realistically it is a decision to not proactively do anything and instead rely on market prices to encourage new entrants to the market.
https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-dcmec/dat...
They must have been real quiet. Most the protests are related to how expensive it has become to rent / buy in this country.
Ireland has encouraged and allowed a huge number of data centers to be setup here and been very slow to implement legislation for other green forms of energy generation. We don't need dirty forms of energy production here like coal and peat just to make energy cheap. Relying on Oil and Gas leaves us hugely at the whims of the international markets.
| now importing most of our energy
14.0% of its electricity in 2024 according to https://www.seai.ie/data-and-insights/seai-statistics/key-pu...
It's great to produce something for free but if it wouldn't have been more then a couple of hours work to verify each of these tools, write tests etc. Even better would have been to produce a open source library
I'm sure they can fire you but it seems to be "at will" employment in most of the US anyway.
In Ireland and Canada such a clause would likely fall under being "unreasonable" for low paid employees. Similar to how a "non-compete" is not worth the paper it's written on (excluding when direct financial compensation is paid. Eg gardening leave).
If you're meeting their expectations it's none of their business in my opinion.
I think that is a risk with hiring regardless. Both sides have an information gap.
I joined a place and within a week realized it was a disaster and I didn't want to work there. If the company had informed me half the teams had quit / was in the process of quiting I would not have joined. It's not like I could go back and get my old job
Non competes in Canada and the EU are generally not enforceable but you see them regularly. Why should this line be any different.
Edit: which -> why
They claim to control for these factors in the 5th paragraph of the article here. Which is a standard thing to do in these kind of studies.
So you're point is either not relevant or that they didn't control for age correctly?