Cyther606
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Throughout history, suspicionless surveillance has been carried out by mafioso to oppress and control.
Of your suspicionless surveillance, you assert "this time is different". The assertion fails.
The Nazis could use your arguments word for word on dissenters of the Gestapo.
Thanks Mao, but everything is relative. Maybe what you need is a nice fat doobie. While you're lighting up next to me, know that I as a proud simpleton, find cans of _diesel fuel_ to be "technically impressive". Imagine that?
> Piece by piece, you cease to exist. It takes about half an hour to vanish someone, completely.
https://news.vice.com/article/how-a-mexican-cartel-demolishe...
Python really needs to step up the game to stay ahead of up and coming languages like Nim, which looks like this:
import rdstdin, strutils
let
time24 = readLineFromStdin("Enter a 24-hour time: ").split(':').map(parseInt)
hours24 = time24[0]
minutes24 = time24[1]
flights: array[8, tuple[since: int,
depart: string,
arrive: string]] = [(480, "8:00 a.m.", "10:16 a.m."),
(583, "9:43 a.m.", "11:52 a.m."),
(679, "11:19 a.m.", "1:31 p.m."),
(767, "12:47 p.m.", "3:00 p.m."),
(840, "2:00 p.m.", "4:08 p.m."),
(945, "3:45 p.m.", "5:55 p.m."),
(1140, "7:00 p.m.", "9:20 p.m."),
(1305, "9:45 p.m.", "11:58 p.m.")]
proc minutesSinceMidnight(hours: int = hours24, minutes: int = minutes24): int =
hours * 60 + minutes
proc cmpFlights(m = minutesSinceMidnight()): seq[int] =
result = newSeq[int](flights.len)
for i in 0 .. <flights.len:
result[i] = abs(m - flights[i].since)
proc getClosest(): int =
for k,v in cmpFlights():
if v == cmpFlights().min: return k
echo "Closest departure time is ", flights[getClosest()].depart,
", arriving at ", flights[getClosest()].arrive
And performs like this: Lang Time [ms] Memory [KB] Compile Time [ms] Compressed Code [B]
Nim 1400 1460 893 486
C++ 1478 2717 774 728
D 1518 2388 1614 669
Rust 1623 2632 6735 934
Java 1874 24428 812 778
OCaml 2384 4496 125 782
Go 3116 1664 596 618
Haskell 3329 5268 3002 1091
LuaJit 3857 2368 - 519
Lisp 8219 15876 1043 1007
Racket 8503 130284 24793 741
http://goran.krampe.se/2014/10/20/i-missed-nim/If you're looking for a statically typed Python that can be grokked in a matter of minutes, and compiles down to a static binary like Go does, and runs as fast as C in benchmarks, you should definitely check out the Nim compiler [1].
Code example:
import rdstdin, strutils
let
time24 = readLineFromStdin("Enter a 24-hour time: ").split(':').map(parseInt)
hours24 = time24[0]
minutes24 = time24[1]
flights: array[8, tuple[since: int,
depart: string,
arrive: string]] = [(480, "8:00 a.m.", "10:16 a.m."),
(583, "9:43 a.m.", "11:52 a.m."),
(679, "11:19 a.m.", "1:31 p.m."),
(767, "12:47 p.m.", "3:00 p.m."),
(840, "2:00 p.m.", "4:08 p.m."),
(945, "3:45 p.m.", "5:55 p.m."),
(1140, "7:00 p.m.", "9:20 p.m."),
(1305, "9:45 p.m.", "11:58 p.m.")]
proc minutesSinceMidnight(hours: int = hours24, minutes: int = minutes24): int =
hours * 60 + minutes
proc cmpFlights(m = minutesSinceMidnight()): seq[int] =
result = newSeq[int](flights.len)
for i in 0 .. <flights.len:
result[i] = abs(m - flights[i].since)
proc getClosest(): int =
for k,v in cmpFlights():
if v == cmpFlights().min: return k
echo "Closest departure time is ", flights[getClosest()].depart,
", arriving at ", flights[getClosest()].arrive
Statistics (on an x86_64 Intel Core2Quad Q9300): Lang Time [ms] Memory [KB] Compile Time [ms] Compressed Code [B]
Nim 1400 1460 893 486
C++ 1478 2717 774 728
D 1518 2388 1614 669
Rust 1623 2632 6735 934
Java 1874 24428 812 778
OCaml 2384 4496 125 782
Go 3116 1664 596 618
Haskell 3329 5268 3002 1091
LuaJit 3857 2368 - 519
Lisp 8219 15876 1043 1007
Racket 8503 130284 24793 741
This language deserves your attention.> In a video published on Liveleak, a close range “execution style” shows no blast effect or blood, from a weapon capable of devastating effect. (See YouTube demonstration of AK47 effect [2])
> Ballistics experts consulted today describe videos of the French attack as “staged theatrical events.” Other than the suspicious HD video, experts have already noted that, without coming close to “conspiracy theory” dot-connecting, the weapons eject no shell casings, bullets supposedly hit concrete with no effect whatsoever, even from “point blank” range.
> You see, the AK47 round, 7.62×39 is not only very powerful but typically has a steel core for penetrating body armour. When hitting concrete, an AK round throws up large chunks of debris, unseen in this event.
> Preliminary analysis of the audio as well demonstrates a frequency indicating the subsonic report of a blank round. In an “urban canyon,” a supersonic round from an assault rifle creates a noticeable high frequency “crack” with a secondary “report” or echo, generally described as “crack-pop.”
> It has taken only a few hours for press outlets to question perfectly timed HD video from a seemingly fearless bystander who is witnessing actors firing blanks incapable of operating the ejection system of a weapon, imaginary bullets that leave concrete pristine and blood free.
1. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/15/neo-paris-terror-the...
Please, instead of bemoaning your complete lack of privacy online, do something about it for a change. Download Tor Browser right now.
Tor Browser bundle on Win/Mac/Linux: https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en
Orweb on Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.guardianp....
OnionBrowser on iOS: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/onion-browser/id519296448?mt....
Show me _any_ video of a loaded AK-47 being fired, even from a _prone position_, wherein zero recoil is exhibited by the weapon. It is simply not credible to claim AK-47s can be fired with zero recoil. That is a patent impossibility unless blanks are fired. At a minimum, if the muzzle of the weapon doesn't rise, then the energy should be transferred into the shoulder of the shooter. The energy from the gunpowder being ignited has to transfer somewhere, unless there was no gunpowder to begin with. It's even more unbelievable to see a Kalashnikov exhibit no recoil while being fired by a running person _mid-stride_.
Think for yourself. Who benefits most from animosity towards radical Muslims.
Watch the raw, uncut video of the supposed police shooting for yourself, right now: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc6_1420632668
You will see:
- No blood, anywhere on the scene. Zero blood from the policeman "shot" with a 7.62mm round at point blank range.
- No flinching of the policeman "shot" at point blank range.
- Zero recoil exhibited by the Kalashnikov
Cross check this video with any other AK-47 video on Youtube.
View it in slow motion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_c4IUO6h7w
Tor Browser bundle on Win/Mac/Linux: https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en
Orweb on Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.guardianp...
OnionBrowser on iOS: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/onion-browser/id519296448?mt...
Here it is again in slow motion, zoomed in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_c4IUO6h7w
Kalashnikov rifles chambered at 7.62mm exhibit greater than zero recoil under the best of circumstances.
It simply isn't credible to state that a Kalashnikov rifle will not exhibit _any_ recoil.
And to pretend as if a 7.62mm round fired at point blank range into a human target would cause _no_ amount of blood splatter or blowback in the target is highly suspect.
There is no visual of a bullet hitting this police officer and I will not apologize for my statements inciting controversy. Watch the video. In less than a minute you will see I am accurately describing the events as they unfold on video.
Here are some entertaining thought exercises:
A cyber 9/11 is linked to Bitcoin. Can Bitcoin developers be sanctioned?
A cyber 9/11 is linked to Tor. Can Tor developers be sanctioned?
You donate to Wikileaks, which is linked to a national security threat. Can you be sanctioned?
Section 1(ii)(B) applies to _any_ individual or entity, domestic or abroad, developing or facilitating development of pentesting or related software employed against vague and faceless "national security interests". But don't you worry, because this is only applicable to the "Chinese" threat which may actually be true for the first couple of years to build political support for the eventual, predictable abuses of power.