Civitello

Perhaps if there was success she would have had no material power and not have been responsible for the success.

>can't get married<br> This is the next frontier in marriage equality.

It shrank because of all the boys going there to get stupider.

The email was a bit much, just altering the ready message should have been sufficient.

Fine, I'll yield the weasel word point, the rest of my comment stands.

TL;DR we found these chemicals present but with only one cherry picked exception we make no quantifiable claims of potential harm. That exception is lead, and we used the strictest standard we are aware of to describe the "dose", also note that we assume that the product is ingested to come to our conclusion. We also use weasel wording to avoid explicitly claiming that there are any regulatory or legal violations.

> Imagine telling the homeowner to recover damage from their insurance company.

That is exactly how these things work in the US.

> The insurance company should recover their costs from Tesla.

These two things are not mutually exclusive.

It is hard to cover Tesla in good faith without frequently reporting on things likely to cause FUD, reality has a well known anti-tesla bias.

This would look incredible in VR.

As someone who has worked in compliance testing for tightly controlled software platforms, things like this piss me off. These problems have known solutions.

depends on the goal of the speaker

heck there are probably humans who can sight read ROT13

> Every use case we have is essentially “Here’s a block of text, extract something from it.” As a rule, if you ask GPT to give you the names of companies mentioned in a block of text, it will not give you a random company (unless there are no companies in the text – there’s that null hypothesis problem!). Make it two steps, first: > Does this block of text mention a company? If no, good you've got your null result. If yes: > Please list the names of companies in this block of text.