Chirpper
Joined 5 months ago
Joined 5 months ago
Right now I'm just trying to prove people care enough about talking to real humans to change where they do it.
The goal was to make accountability and anonymity coexist. Identity verification doesn't produce accountability, social consequence does. You know this if you've ever had a friend vouch for someone who then embarrassed them.
TrustRank isn't content moderation. It's measuring humanity. Your posts, comments, votes, even small actions like adding a username or thanking your inviter, these are all signals. We're not moderating what you say. We're moderating whether you're human.
The motto is 'Just Be Human.' Which also means act like you would if you were in the same room with someone.
No AI-generated discourse. Humans comment and vote. AI can generate content a human chooses to post, but the conversation layer is human-only by design.
Happy to get into TrustScore mechanics, the invite reward model, or why this is structurally different from Lobsters.
Seeding content is editorial. Faking discourse defeats the purpose of the site.
It may make the road to critical mass harder to reach, but it's not worth faking humans to create a human only space, in this world of so many lies everywhere.