Recent submissions

Comment · 2 months ago
That information is intentionally left out
Comment · 3 months ago
There's one way around that which is requesting a wildcard cert, but then that has its own rammifications
Comment · 4 months ago
I'm calling BS, sorry. It looks light, and barely anything beyond surface level of what we could all could guess would be in a system prompt. This smells nothing more of a "claude give a system prompt that anthropic would use as a system prompt for claude"

From what we know, there are some very specific details baked into the prompt as safety guards, where are those? Again calling BS and I'm not gonna waste more thought/words on this

Comment · 10 months ago
No but there is validated parking for customers of other services.

This is going to be the downfall of GA

Comment · 1 year ago
The language is tough love, and I think it's important despite what the first respondent has said.

Much of the language used seems to stem from nauseating interactions that have occured in kernel world around rust usage.

I'm not a big fan of rust for reasons that were not brought up during the kernel discussions, but I'm also not an opponent of moving forward. I don't quite understand the pushback against memory safe languages and defensiveness against adopting modern tooling/languages

Comment · 1 year ago
Hey the reason behind my username!

To add something useful, OSes are the one area where reinventing the wheel leads to a lot of innovation.

It's a complete strip down and an opportunity to change or do things that previously had a lot of friction due to the amount of change that would occur.

Comment · 1 year ago
Also surprised they don't have the ability to rollback
Comment · 1 year ago
Bring back the init wars! /S

Username relevant...

I got into Linux right before the init wars, and while they were hectic times they brought a lot of attention, discussions, and options to Linux.

Comment · 1 year ago
You'd be surprised how many people are actually doing this exact kind of solutioning.

It's also not that costly to do if you think about the problem correctly

If you continue down the brute forcing route you can do mischievous things like sign up for thousands and thousands of free accounts across numerous network connections to LLM APIs and plug away

Comment · 1 year ago
In the dishwasher's defense it is pretty smart compared to an LLM.
Comment · 1 year ago
Haha. You're 100% correct in the AGI/AI thing. I'm just sick and tired of every article being about AI, it's great people but we can't stop innovating and attending to other areas of technology.

>You can do a lot with glorified prediction systems that require human prompting >People don't need a machine that wonders the same stuff they do; they need something that does a specific task in lieu of their own effort.

This is the problem with our current revision with AI; the way I see it those two are in conflict with each other. In lieu of their own effort, the way a vast amount of the would be users think, is "without promoting" which would lend towards AGI than AI.

>Actually, they are arguably more valuable than AGI because you can more easily communicate and utilize their value proposition.

To you and I this might be true, but to your average non-techie I don't think it's quite as true as you would like it to be.

Short term it is very true, everyone sees the value until you realize it's inherit limitations and the 'shiny, wears off

Comment · 1 year ago
I'm saving all of these articles for the next time we go through the "AI (LLMs) is going to change the world," cycle.

The systems we use can only be as smart and intuitive as the people who prompt them.

On top of it, this (LLMs) is not AI, not even close, if anything they are glorified prediction systems that require human prompting.

Comment · 1 year ago
My vote for comment thread of the year. Had coffee coming out of my nose with these two
Comment · 1 year ago
Incredibly fast.

While the 9a and 9 pro are very similar, for comunity based development this is substantial.

I am often very critial, but I must give props to the grapeneos team.

Comment · 1 year ago
Very cool site, great implementation.

Calorie burn is dependent on weight and body fat. Individuals who are x+25kg will burn way more calories than x.

For users who come to this site to supplement their weight loss information might be misinformed in their journey, or worse,use it as a primary source and become discouraged because their idea of calorie loss is a little skewed due to the conservative numbers currently shown.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton